On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:37:30 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Therefore, I've been slowly writing a proper GLEP that would describe
> > all of metadata.xml in detail. Here's the current draft for review:
>
> Sounds like a good idea!
>
>
app-forensics/lynis
dev-libs/log4cplus
dev-vcs/colorsvn
dev-vcs/git-deploy
dev-vcs/topgit
sci-electronics/fritzing
sys-auth/libnss-cache
media-video/nvidia-settings
Feel free. If you need some more info please poke me on IRC.
--
Regards,
Christian Ruppert
Gentoo Linux developer, Bugzilla adminis
# Michael Palimaka (17 Mar 2016)
# Dead upstream. Doesn't work with new Twitter API.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
net-im/qtwitter
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:37:30 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Therefore, I've been slowly writing a proper GLEP that would describe
> > all of metadata.xml in detail. Here's the current draft for review:
>
> Sounds like a good idea!
>
>
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 22:43:27 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:24:32 +0900 Aaron Bauman wrote:
> > # Aaron Bauman (19 Mar 2016)
> > # Unpatched security vulnerability per bug #512356.
> > # Masked for removal in 30 days.
> > app-forensics/chkrootkit
>
> Hey! This is a great t
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:24:32 +0900 Aaron Bauman wrote:
> # Aaron Bauman (19 Mar 2016)
> # Unpatched security vulnerability per bug #512356.
> # Masked for removal in 30 days.
> app-forensics/chkrootkit
Hey! This is a great tool and new version with fix for this bug is
available. It looks like for
Hello, all.
Long story short: while working on various metadata.xml-related
aspects, it bite us pretty hard that we lack proper spec for
metadata.xml file. What we have is pretty much the DTD, some partial
GLEPs (that sometimes provide incorrect info) and random bugs. ml
posts...
Therefore, I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Andreas K. Huettel (19 Mar 2016)
# Dead upstream since 2010, new VMware uses new incompatible
# proprietary libview. No other consumers. Removal in 30 days.
# Bug 569930
x11-libs/libview
- --
Andreas K. Hüttel
Gentoo Linux developer (council, pe
On 19/03/16 18:24, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> # Aaron Bauman (19 Mar 2016)
> # Unpatched security vulnerability per bug #512356.
> # Masked for removal in 30 days.
> app-forensics/chkrootkit
>
I can look at taking care of this package if nobody else is keen.
Hello, everyone.
Since the GLEP 68 mail didn't bring much discussion, I would like to
point out explicitly a few things that might require some. They are
mostly listed in backwards compatibility section of the GLEP [1],
and they were caught by XML Schemas [2].
I would like to know your opinion on
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Therefore, I've been slowly writing a proper GLEP that would describe
> all of metadata.xml in detail. Here's the current draft for review:
Sounds like a good idea!
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:68
I reviewed your spec bas
# Aaron Bauman (19 Mar 2016)
# Unpatched security vulnerability per bug #512356.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
app-forensics/chkrootkit
--
Cheers,
Aaron Bauman
Gentoo Linux Developer
GnuPG FP: 1536 F4B3 72EB 9C54 11F5 5C43 246D 23A2 10FB 0F3E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally s
12 matches
Mail list logo