[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-03-06 23:59 UTC

2016-03-06 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2016-03-06 23:59 UTC. Removals: dev-java/bytecode 20160306-12:59 chewi b1efc72 dev-java/concurrent-util 20160303-13:16 chewi 2140f02 dev-java/dsiutils

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] eapply_user: allow empty directories

2016-03-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >> --- a/bin/phase-helpers.sh >> +++ b/bin/phase-helpers.sh >> @@ -1089,6 +1089,10 @@ if ___eapi_has_eapply_user; then >> local basedir=${PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT%/}/etc/portage/patches >> >> local d applied >> +

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] eapply_user: allow empty directories

2016-03-06 Thread Zac Medico
On 03/06/2016 03:01 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Without this, an empty directory in > /etc/portage/patches/$cat/$pkg will result in an fatal error. > > Fixes: 573920 > Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld > --- > bin/phase-helpers.sh | 8 +++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Justin
On 06/03/16 20:49, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:22:18 + > "Justin " wrote: > >> On 06/03/16 19:28, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 Davide Pesavento wrote: >>> > So I guess we c

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:22:18 + "Justin " wrote: > On 06/03/16 19:28, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 > >> Davide Pesavento wrote: > > > >>> So I guess we could use the following form when SLOTs are nee

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Justin
On 06/03/16 19:28, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 >> Davide Pesavento wrote: > >>> So I guess we could use the following form when SLOTs are needed: >>> media-libs/gstreamer:1.0 >>> ? > >> Prolly. > >> Just to be clea

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:28:33 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 > > Davide Pesavento wrote: > > >> So I guess we could use the following form when SLOTs are needed: > >> media-libs/gstreamer:1.0 > >> ? > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 > Davide Pesavento wrote: >> So I guess we could use the following form when SLOTs are needed: >> media-libs/gstreamer:1.0 >> ? > Prolly. > Just to be clear, I have no clue what the original use of > was and wha

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 Davide Pesavento wrote: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:12:03 + > > "Justin " wrote: > > > >> On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: > >> > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Justin
On 06/03/16 18:18, Michał Górny wrote: >> We should definitely include SLOTs in the allowed syntax. > > Why? What's their use? In fact, does have any use? Because as I > see it, it's just some fancy feature that could turn package name into > link to packages.gentoo.org and nothing more... > Us

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Davide Pesavento
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:12:03 + > "Justin " wrote: > >> On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 >> >> Michał Górny wrote: >> >> >> >>> Ple

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Kent Fredric
On 7 March 2016 at 07:12, Justin wrote: >> Slots are not accepted in elements? Is that intentional? If so, >> is there something else we can use? >> > > We should definitely include SLOTs in the allowed syntax. Enable HTML5 audio/video support via media-libs/gstreamer:1.0 Enable HTML5 audi

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:12:03 + "Justin " wrote: > On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 > >> Michał Górny wrote: > >> > >>> Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with th

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Justin
On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 >> Michał Górny wrote: >> >>> Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list >>> of current metadata.xml validation failures (it's quite lo

[gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, everyone. As you may be aware, we were considering replacing the DTD files for our XML documents with a more modern and more complete format. As part of considering options for this, I've written XML Schema files [1] that provide a more correct replacement for the current DTD files and I'd

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/perdition

2016-03-06 Thread Aaron Bauman
# Aaron Bauman (05 Mar 2016) # Per security bug #491372 this package is vulnerable # and unmaintained. Removal in 30 days. net-mail/perdition -- Cheers, Aaron Bauman Gentoo Linux Developer GnuPG FP: 1536 F4B3 72EB 9C54 11F5 5C43 246D 23A2 10FB 0F3E signature.asc Description: This is a digital

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] bin/portageq: add a matcher to match the orphaned (maintainer-needed) packages

2016-03-06 Thread Göktürk Yüksek
Per GLEP 67, orphaned packages do not have a in metadata.xml. They can't be matched using '--maintainer-email=maintainer-nee...@gentoo.org' anymore. Add a new command line argument '--orphaned' to match the orphaned packages. Signed-off-by: Göktürk Yüksek --- bin/portageq | 13 + 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] amd64 systemd stage3

2016-03-06 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 3/4/16 12:46 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 3/4/16 11:37 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> El vie, 04-03-2016 a las 07:39 -0500, Anthony G. Basile escribió: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I've been working the last few days on building amd64 systemd >>> stage3's. >>> After solving some dependency problems

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/dragonflycms

2016-03-06 Thread Aaron Bauman
# Aaron Bauman (05 Mar 2016) # Per security bug #448826 this package is vulnerable # and unmaintained. Removal in 30 days. www-apps/dragonflycms -- Cheers, Aaron Bauman Gentoo Linux Developer GnuPG FP: 1536 F4B3 72EB 9C54 11F5 5C43 246D 23A2 10FB 0F3E signature.asc Description: This is a digi

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Davide Pesavento
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list >> of current metadata.xml validation failures (it's quite long). > > And here's the list: > ... > /var/db/repo

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:04:22 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list > > of current metadata.xml validation failures (it's quite long). > > And here's the list: This dump is

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/perdition

2016-03-06 Thread Aaron Bauman
# Aaron Bauman (05 Mar 2016) # Per security bug #491372 this package is vulnerable # and unmaintained. Removal in 30 days. net-mail/perdition -- Cheers, Aaron Bauman Gentoo Linux Developer GnuPG FP: 1536 F4B3 72EB 9C54 11F5 5C43 246D 23A2 10FB 0F3E signature.asc Description: This is a digital

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/dragonflycms

2016-03-06 Thread Aaron Bauman
# Aaron Bauman (05 Mar 2016) # Per security bug #448826 this package is vulnerable # and unmaintained. Removal in 30 days. www-apps/dragonflycms -- Cheers, Aaron Bauman Gentoo Linux Developer GnuPG FP: 1536 F4B3 72EB 9C54 11F5 5C43 246D 23A2 10FB 0F3E signature.asc Description: This is a digi

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list > of current metadata.xml validation failures (it's quite long). And here's the list: /var/db/repos/gentoo/app-crypt/eid-mw/metadata.xml:26: element pkg: Schemas validi

[gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

2016-03-06 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, everyone. As you may be aware, we were considering replacing the DTD files for our XML documents with a more modern and more complete format. As part of considering options for this, I've written XML Schema files [1] that provide a more correct replacement for the current DTD files and I'd