On 02/09/2016 07:01 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:53:09 +0300 > agentsmith wrote:
> > >> Cool tool i create
ebuild. >> >> On 02/09/2016 05:47 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
> > Could
>
> On 02/09/2016 05:55 AM, Urbain YANG wrote:
> Thank you very much!
>
> And wis
kentfredric 7d04ef2
dev-perl/Time-Moment20160228-10:33 kentfredric bfbdecf
dev-perl/Type-Tiny-XS 20160228-10:54 kentfredric d56e500
dev-python/jpype20160225-00:39 monsieurp 759459f
dev-python/pyopengl_accelerate 20160222-11:06 xmw 139e680
dev-ros
Our bug queue has 83 bugs!
If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs.
To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5
Thanks!
Fix the _ninjaopts_from_makeopts to handle no-parameter '-j' and '-l'
options correctly and convert them to appropriate parametrized ninja
options.
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 15 +--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/
Fix _ninjaopts_from_makeopts to handle -k correctly. Make does not
support parameters to -k, while ninja requires one. Therefore, handle
only a single '-k' and convert it into '-k 0' (no limit of failing
tasks).
---
eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deleti
Hello,
Just a quick two patches against cmake-utils that fix MAKEOPTS->ninja
conversion. In particular:
1. -k never takes value in make, so do not account for that, and always
convert '-k' to '-k 0',
2. -j and -l have optional values in make, so figure out if we're being
passed a correct v
Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
> Notice the --whole-file part there.
Are there perhaps plans to remove this?
Before the reversed ChangeLogs, this option was useful,
but perhaps now removing it would really lower the traffic?
One would have to make a bunch of tests over 1-2 months, perhaps:
a) two with
