[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: media-libs/gstreamer/

2016-02-26 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le jeudi 25 février 2016 à 23:02 +, Andreas Hüttel a écrit : > commit: 684b1b89aeb8dd00b56d2296ddb561308e260041 > Author: Andreas K. Hüttel gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Thu Feb 25 22:53:15 2016 + > Commit: Andreas Hüttel gentoo org> > CommitDate: Thu Feb 25 22:58:27 2016 +

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed?

2016-02-26 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: >>> >>> And currently the git history is still almost empty... >>> >> >> If you want pre-migration history you need to fetch that separately. > > How? Neither on gitweb.gentoo.org nor on github I found an obvious > reposit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-26 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:31:28 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Patrick Lauer > wrote: > > Ohey, > > > > I've opened a bug at: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573922 > > > > The idea here is to change the order of the providers of > > virtual/udev. For existi

[gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed?

2016-02-26 Thread Martin Vaeth
Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> And currently the git history is still almost empty... >> > > If you want pre-migration history you need to fetch that separately. How? Neither on gitweb.gentoo.org nor on github I found an obvious repository with this data. > It is about 1.7G. > Considering that this r

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-26 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Ohey, > > I've opened a bug at: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573922 > > The idea here is to change the order of the providers of virtual/udev. > For existing installs this has zero impact. > For stage3 this would mean that eudev i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed?

2016-02-26 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote: > > And currently the git history is still almost empty... > If you want pre-migration history you need to fetch that separately. It is about 1.7G. Considering that this represents a LOT more than 2-3 years of history (including periods where

[gentoo-dev] Re: Bug #565566: Why is it still not fixed?

2016-02-26 Thread Martin Vaeth
Gordon Pettey wrote: >> >> Already now this means that you need 2 (or already 3?) times the >> disk space as for an rysnc mirror; multiply all numbers by 4 >> if you used squashfs to store the tree. [...] > > Or, in 2-3 years, maybe people will stop with the hyperbole Hyperbole? Really? Let's fi