[gentoo-dev] RFC: intel-sdp-r1.eclass, Take #2

2016-02-20 Thread David Seifert
Dear all, after much criticism, I present you with an improved eclass for handling the Intel 2016 (and hopefully beyond) suite of software. We have improved the following: * Made variables names more clear, to separate upstream vars from internal/Gentoo vars. * Practically no more global state in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: games.eclass policy

2016-02-20 Thread Andreas K. Hüttel
Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2016, 02:25:08 schrieb Ryan Hill: > > > > Good for you. So... ignoring majority is fine as long as you can prove > > that they don't ignore one of their old fellows. Good. > > I have never had a problem talking to the games team, and I suspect the > same is true for anyone

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-libs/libfpx

2016-02-20 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 15:40:03 +0900 Aaron Bauman wrote: > # Aaron Bauman (20 Feb 2016) > # No maintainer and unmitigated vulnerabilities. > # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 395367 > media-libs/libfpx Excuse me, what? It is used by both imagemagick and graphicsmagick. With libfpx masked the tre