On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>> You want me to use a potentially unstable live ebuild instead?
>> Well, no, that's not gonna happen.
>
> Are you demanding that someone else produces for you, and refusing to
> do anything but consume?
>
Keep in mind that t
All,
was this patch ever applied to gcc? If so, which versions?
Thanks,
William
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
From a1162d3453b7aaef0294a427785e38da687fd547 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans de Graaff
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 21:08:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass: support non-default bindir
By default gems can provide binaries to be bin-wrapped in /usr/bin in a
directory called "bin"
Ryan Hill wrote:
> You want me to use a potentially unstable live ebuild instead?
> Well, no, that's not gonna happen.
Are you demanding that someone else produces for you, and refusing to
do anything but consume?
If the stable version is broken and if needing to use ~ or live is
not up to your s
