On 16 Dec 2015 06:44, Duncan wrote:
> Mike Frysinger posted on Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:51 -0500 as excerpted:
> > On 10 Dec 2015 10:32, William Hubbs wrote:
> >> I want to start a discussion about the usage of OpenRC's C api as
> >> defined in rc.h.
> >
> > very few projects ever picked up the API/
On 12/16/2015 01:44 AM, Duncan wrote:
>>
>> look at the RDEPEND in ebuilds. if a package uses the libs, it should
>> be listed there.
>
> Even with openrc still in @system? Doesn't look like that bug has been
> fixed yet.[1]
>
No one agrees on which @system packages can be omitted from (R)DEP
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:31:08AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Alexander Berntsen
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > On 16/12/15 13:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> I don't see how this is dishonest.
> > You answered this yoursel
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 16/12/15 13:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> I don't see how this is dishonest.
> You answered this yourself,
>
>> They'll just be credited side-by-side with everybody else in once
>> pl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 16/12/15 13:39, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I don't see how this is dishonest.
You answered this yourself,
> They'll just be credited side-by-side with everybody else in once
> place.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~ale
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>
> I agree with Mike that this isn't kosher. It just isn't honest.
>
I don't really have a horse in this race, but I don't see how this is
dishonest. What is being proposed is moving from attribution
scattered all over the place to attr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I agree with Mike that this isn't kosher. It just isn't honest.
On 15/12/15 20:37, William Hubbs wrote:
> Multiple entries are what I want to get away from; it is a
> nightmare to maintain, and the vcs shows far better than you or I
> ever could whi
