On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:53:17PM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> $(cmake-utils_use_with foo LibFoo)
> -DWITH_LibFoo=$(usex foo)
>
> What do you think?
Do it! I have no idea what the cmake one is supposed to do without
reading docs. The usex one is really obvious.
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 06:51:04 + (UTC)
"Eray Aslan" wrote:
> commit: e9620a23f862f69352b0ca31de2f5e4ed642cc69
> Author: Eray Aslan gentoo org>
> AuthorDate: Wed Nov 18 06:50:26 2015 +
> Commit: Eray Aslan gentoo org>
> CommitDate: Wed Nov 18 06:50:26 2015 +
> URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> And, as a developer maintaining bar in #3 above, you should make
> sure that either the stable version satisfies all rdeps (even those
> in ~arch), or you don't remove the EAPI5 ~arch version until all the
> rdeps are EAPI6.
>
> Theoretically repo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18/11/15 02:25 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
>> It doesn't seem that unlikely to me...
>
>> 1. Otherwise stable system with package "foo" keyworded as
>> ~arch.
>
>> 2. foo needs some dependency
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:47:35 -0500
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Brian Dolbec
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:02:15 +0100
> > Alexis Ballier wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:53:17 +1100
> >> Michael Palimaka wrote:
> >>
> >> > What do you think?
> >>
>
On 11/18/2015 12:55 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> That's taking about half a second if I run it from the command-line.
>
...and this takes even longer:
cinfo = self.grab(['git', self._work_tree, 'diff-tree',
'--name-status',
'--no-renames',
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:06:23 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, »Q« wrote:
>
> > When ~ keywording is needed for dependencies, the PM's output makes
> > it clear what's needed. In cases where EAPI 6 is needed for
> > dependencies but the PM is unaware of EAPI 6, will the
On 11/18/2015 09:48 AM, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Peter Stuge wrote:
>> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>>> However, the largest sticking point, even with parallel threads, is that
>>> it seems the base ChangeLog generation is incredibly slow. It averages
>>> above 350ms per package right now (at 19k packages i
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Michael Palimaka
wrote:
[...]
>
> What do you think?
+1 for banning them.
Thanks,
Davide
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, »Q« wrote:
> When ~ keywording is needed for dependencies, the PM's output makes
> it clear what's needed. In cases where EAPI 6 is needed for
> dependencies but the PM is unaware of EAPI 6, will there be good
> clues in the PM's output that the PM itself needs to be ~
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:05:26 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On 18/11/15 08:25, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >> - If you mix stable and unstable then you are by definition an
> >> advanced user, who will be able to cope with the situation. :)
> Only that there is no real difference to the existi
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:02:15 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:53:17 +1100
>> Michael Palimaka wrote:
>>
>> > What do you think?
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> even if I sometimes use those cmake-utils_use*, they tend to confuse
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 06:59:19 -0500
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> Actually, what is less clear to me is how portage versioning actually
>> works, or if we attach any meaning to the version numbers at all.
>> Both the stable and unstable series a
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:23:55 -0800
Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:02:15 +0100
> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:53:17 +1100
> > Michael Palimaka wrote:
> >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > even if I sometimes use those cmake-utils_use*,
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:02:15 +0100
Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:53:17 +1100
> Michael Palimaka wrote:
>
> > What do you think?
>
>
> +1
>
> even if I sometimes use those cmake-utils_use*, they tend to confuse
> me and find -DABCD=$(usex ...) much easier to understand for
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 06:59:19 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Ulrich Mueller
> wrote:
> >
> > And on what basis would you stabilise Portage, when there are no
> > ebuilds in the tree to test its EAPI 6 code?
> >
>
> As long as the EAPI6 code in the new portage is n
Am Mittwoch, 18. November 2015, 12:12:05 schrieb Alexander Berntsen:
> On 18/11/15 12:05, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > Only that there is no real difference to the existing situation
> > when mixing stable and unstable. It is not guaranteed that all
> > dependencies of an unstable package are stable,
Am Mittwoch, 18. November 2015, 10:25:23 schrieb Alexander Berntsen:
> On 18/11/15 08:25, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > - If you mix stable and unstable then you are by definition an
> > advanced user, who will be able to cope with the situation. :)
>
> This attitude is shitty, and I am willing to wag
Peter Stuge wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > However, the largest sticking point, even with parallel threads, is that
> > it seems the base ChangeLog generation is incredibly slow. It averages
> > above 350ms per package right now (at 19k packages in a full cycle, it's
> > a long time), but som
# Michael Palimaka (18 Nov 2015)
# Ebuilds unfinished work-in-progress. Dead upstream.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #550234.
app-pda/libopensync
app-pda/libopensync-plugin-file
app-pda/libopensync-plugin-gnokii
app-pda/libopensync-plugin-gpe
app-pda/libopensync-plugin-irmc
app-pda/libopens
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> We are talking about people who run Gentoo stable who need to
> keyword several specific packages because the lack of manpower
> leads to Gentoo stable by itself not being very usable for most
> people.
>
In this case, however, I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 18/11/15 13:01, Rich Freeman wrote:
> People who run ~arch are not really end-users - they're
> contributors who have volunteered to test packages.
We are talking about people who run Gentoo stable who need to
keyword several specific packages be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 18/11/15 12:59, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Actually, what is less clear to me is how portage versioning
> actually works, or if we attach any meaning to the version numbers
> at all.
The higher number is the newer version.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gen
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> When I do QA in projects I'm involved with (at least outside of
> Gentoo), we don't do it live on end-user systems. I'll leave the
> details as an exercise for the Gentoo developer.
>
People who run ~arch are not really end-users - they
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> And on what basis would you stabilise Portage, when there are no
> ebuilds in the tree to test its EAPI 6 code?
>
As long as the EAPI6 code in the new portage is no more broken than
the EAPI6 code in the current stable version of portage
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 18/11/15 12:23, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> That sort of QA should take place before making a new Portage
> relaese. I was talking about marking it stable, though.
The problem we are talking about isn't making sure Portage's EAPI 6
support is bug fre
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>> And on what basis would you stabilise Portage, when there are no
>> ebuilds in the tree to test its EAPI 6 code?
> When I do QA in projects I'm involved with (at least outside of
> Gentoo), we don't do it live on end-user systems. I'll leave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 18/11/15 12:05, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Only that there is no real difference to the existing situation
> when mixing stable and unstable. It is not guaranteed that all
> dependencies of an unstable package are stable, so already now
> users may h
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> On 18/11/15 08:25, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> - If you mix stable and unstable then you are by definition an
>> advanced user, who will be able to cope with the situation. :)
> This attitude is shitty, and I am willing to wager a really big
> b
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:53:17 +1100
Michael Palimaka wrote:
> What do you think?
+1
even if I sometimes use those cmake-utils_use*, they tend to confuse
me and find -DABCD=$(usex ...) much easier to understand for the
occasional user of cmake-utils.eclass.
cmake-utils.eclass currently defines 10 helper functions to assist in
configuring packages.
For example:
local mycmakeargs=(
$(cmake-utils_use_with foo LibFoo)
)
which outputs -DWITH_LibFoo=ON or OFF
Most of these helpers were introduced before, and could be replaced by,
usex:
local my
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Alexander Berntsen
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 18/11/15 08:25, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > - If you mix stable and unstable then you are by definition an
> > advanced user, who will be able to cope with the situation. :)
> This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 18/11/15 08:25, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> - If you mix stable and unstable then you are by definition an
> advanced user, who will be able to cope with the situation. :)
This attitude is shitty, and I am willing to wager a really big bunch
of users
33 matches
Mail list logo
