On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Justin (jlec) wrote:
> On 02/11/15 23:38, William Hubbs wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> but instead of adding
>
> DEPEND="||·(
> >=dev-lang/go-1.4
> >=sys-devel/gcc-5.1.0:=[go]
>
> to ebuilds, you could create a virtual/go with that dependency and make all
Hello,
In the last meeting, the Council has decided that the solution to
various problems with herds, projects etc. can't be achieved via ad-hoc
voting. Instead, a full proposal was to be proposed in form of a GLEP.
I have collected the most important points raised during the meeting,
and prepare
El dom, 01-11-2015 a las 14:25 +0100, Patrick Lauer escribió:
>
> On 11/01/2015 01:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим > > wrote:
> > > And why don't just only generate them on rsync mirrors, but
> > > remove them from git repo (like was planned in
On 11/02/2015 09:17 AM, Leno Hou wrote:
> -DEPEND=">=dev-lang/go-1.4:=
> +DEPEND="|| (
> + >=dev-lang/go-1.4:=
> + >=sys-devel/gcc-5.1.0:=[go]
> + )
Note that the council has recently decided that the := operator is
explicitly forbidden inside || ( ) constructs. The clo
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
wrote:
> Matt Turner schrieb:
>>
>> The git transition had been 9 years in the making and has massively
>> improved Gentoo development. Look at the graph of contributions per month:
>> https://www.openhub.net/p/gentoo
>
> I'd like to po
On 11/03/2015 04:04 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Matt Turner schrieb:
>> The git transition had been 9 years in the making and has massively
>> improved Gentoo development. Look at the graph of contributions per
>> month: https://www.openhub.net/p/gentoo
>
> I'd like to point out that
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 08:56:29 -0600
William Hubbs wrote:
> As has been pointed out in the thread so far, gcc-5 only supports
> go-1.4. dev-lang/go is at 1.5, so really the only thing that should be
> built with gccgo is dev-lang/go. Also, the golang eclasses are
> designed to work with dev-lang/go,
Matt Turner schrieb:
The git transition had been 9 years in the making and has massively
improved Gentoo development. Look at the graph of contributions per
month: https://www.openhub.net/p/gentoo
I'd like to point out that some stuff that has previously been done in a
single commit is now se
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 08:45:00AM +0100, Justin (jlec) wrote:
> On 02/11/15 23:38, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA512
> >>
> >> How about a virtual here?
> >
> > I don't see that
On 2015-11-03 05:24, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:17:18 -0500
> "Aaron W. Swenson" wrote:
>
> > Vadim, please don't top post.
>
> But do quote some forty lines from the message you reply to. It
> really helps in case someone lost the original, right? :-)
>
>
> jer
Exactl
On 03/11/15 06:24, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> The way I see it, keeping review and committing/pushing separate is a
>> good thing, and removes a lot of the concerns about hosting a review
>> platform as it is sufficient with read-access
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Apparently my complaining finally re-triggered some action, so sadly
> this looks like the currently best strategy.
You could have simply made a simple post pointing out that changelog
generation appears to be broken and likely had the same e
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Tho I get Dale's somewhat confused and now belabored point as well. For
> people who don't know how to do git on their own, as clearly he doesn't,
> the official signaling of what the stopgap changelog alternatives were
> unt
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Dale wrote:
>> That is why a link was posted for me to use github instead. I
>> do realize and understand that git and github are two different things
>> but it seems they can work together as well. It ended up that the info
>> I needed was o
14 matches
Mail list logo
