*Leno Hou*
E-mail : leno...@gmail.com
Phone : 185-0093-5995
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Leno Hou wrote:
>
> This is a great pleasure to announce that we've made ppc64le stage 3.
>
> 1. We've successfully compiled stage 3 for ppc64le. The stage 3 covers
> most useful functionalities:
>
>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> - - emerge -uD @world would update the dep anyhow
>
> - - emerge -u @world wouldn't rebuild the package if that package
> didn't change, and if the package did change then the new dep would
> get built.
Just to be clear, my point was th
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> So, what are your thoughts for unmessing this?
>
This sounds familiar. :)
Honestly, I wouldn't mind combining them all. Just today I was pinged
by an !expn in IRC and thought to myself, "how many times have I typed
the wrong command to t
On Saturday 12 of September 2015 21:12:25 Michał Górny wrote:
| What are your thoughts? Any other proposals?
Well, there's always an option to set up infra hosted Gerrit or Gitlab and
forget about Github workflow altogether...
regards
MM
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2015, 23:43:43 schrieb Matthew Thode:
>
> Herds are groups of developers that can then be mapped to a package.
>
Heh. See? :)
- --
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfri...@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.
On 09/16/2015 04:25 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Right now we kinda have three layers of team package maintainership
> in Gentoo:
>
> 1. e-mail aliases + bugzilla accounts,
>
> 2. herds,
>
> 3. projects.
>
> Now if we get into the details, it's all very messy.
>
>
> E-mail aliases ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2015, 23:25:33 schrieb Michał Górny:
>
> To summarize, I see the following issues:
>
> 1. All three layers are totally disjoint, stored in completely
> different format in completely different places.
>
> 2. Only herds a
Hello,
Right now we kinda have three layers of team package maintainership
in Gentoo:
1. e-mail aliases + bugzilla accounts,
2. herds,
3. projects.
Now if we get into the details, it's all very messy.
E-mail aliases are pretty much handled by obscure, proprietary
scripts. Formally Gentoo dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/09/15 04:30 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
>>
>> If you modify an eclass, you're responsible for the outcome.
>> Even if means revbumping hundreds of ebuilds for the sake of
>> it. Note that t
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> If you modify an eclass, you're responsible for the outcome. Even if
> means revbumping hundreds of ebuilds for the sake of it. Note that this
> is the kind of revbump that wouldn't require resetting stable keywords
> as long as deps are sat
Dnia 2015-09-16, o godz. 15:49:24
Rich Freeman napisał(a):
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> > As for virtuals and eclasses, I don't really understand why anyone
> > thinks they are special in any regard. In both cases, we're talking
> > about regular dependency change
On Thu, 2015-07-02 at 21:50 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El jue, 02-07-2015 a las 15:40 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió:
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > Looking for some feedback on creating a new project and herd for the
> > MATE Desktop environment. The goal, like many other DE based
> > projects,
> > is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/09/15 03:49 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
>> 2. Dependency changes that don't need to apply immediately
>> don't need revbump. For example, if foo.eclass raises minimal
>> required version o
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 21:31:04 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Assuming the developer understands the consequences of bumping and
> not bumping
Well that narrows it down to about three people, and only if they're
thinking very very carefully.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signat
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> As for virtuals and eclasses, I don't really understand why anyone
> thinks they are special in any regard. In both cases, we're talking
> about regular dependency change in metadata, and we need to understand
> the consequences. And they're
Dnia 2015-09-16, o godz. 17:49:24
"Andreas K. Huettel" napisał(a):
> Hi all,
>
> here's a quote from the Council 20140826 summary:
>
> > Dynamic dependencies in Portage
> > ===
> > During discussion, is was remarked that some changes, e.g. to
> > dependencies in ecl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/09/15 02:13 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> How would virtuals be handled with static dependencies?
AFAIK virtuals would need to be handled the same as anything else --
when updating an atom in RDEPEND, the virtual's ebuild needs to be
revbumped.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/16/2015 09:21 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 09/16/2015 05:49 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> here's a quote from the Council 20140826 summary:
>>
>>> Dynamic dependencies in Portage
>>> === During discus
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Andreas K. Huettel
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here's a quote from the Council 20140826 summary:
>
>> Dynamic dependencies in Portage
>> ===
>> During discussion, is was remarked that some changes, e.g. to
>> dependencies in eclasses, could re
On 09/16/2015 05:49 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here's a quote from the Council 20140826 summary:
>
>> Dynamic dependencies in Portage
>> ===
>> During discussion, is was remarked that some changes, e.g. to
>> dependencies in eclasses, could require ma
Hi all,
here's a quote from the Council 20140826 summary:
> Dynamic dependencies in Portage
> ===
> During discussion, is was remarked that some changes, e.g. to
> dependencies in eclasses, could require mass rebuilds of packages.
>
> Vote:
> - "The council asks the
On 16/09/15 10:56, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Tomorrow, code.google.com will turn off write access to all
>> remaining projects[0]. As such, Gentoo ebuilds which still have
>> HOMEPAGE= pointing there should be updated.
>
> Hmm. Codehaus has also
Hi Tobias,
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Tomorrow, code.google.com will turn off write access to all
> remaining projects[0]. As such, Gentoo ebuilds which still have
> HOMEPAGE= pointing there should be updated.
Hmm. Codehaus has also been shut down this year in May, but packages still
re
On 16 September 2015 at 19:40, konsolebox wrote:
> And I find it so wrong that it makes me think that it shouldn't have
> been acknowledged by any packaging system. That versioning madness
> should have been just fixed in the ebuilds level.
Yeah. My experience with versions is its better to hav
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:29 PM, konsolebox wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>
> We consider 5.01 and 5.010 as equal versions.
>>
And do we still plan to keep them equal when we fix =*?
>>
>>> Yes.
>
> Mak
On 15 September 2015 at 06:54, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
>> I think it'd be okay to e.g. change the meaning and behavior of * in
>> a new EAPI.
>
> Bug 560466 now.
Assuming the syntax can be changed in a future EAPI.
What EAPI applies to the use of these specifiers on the command line?
What EAPI
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
wrote:
> Semantic versioning is a new fad.
I believe it's already been there for a while. It just didn't become
a standard soon.
> Certain upstreams still think that
> 5.10 is a lower version that 5.2. Perl used to be notorious for doing
> this,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
We consider 5.01 and 5.010 as equal versions.
>
>>> And do we still plan to keep them equal when we fix =*?
>
>> Yes.
Makes me wonder. Are there even packages that still follow this
fo
Am 2015-09-16 um 02:37 schrieb Rich Freeman:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:13:34PM +0200, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 09/15/2015 02:00 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
If you have interest in this package then you can do one or more of:
* becom
29 matches
Mail list logo
