On 8 September 2015 at 03:26, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> And as the cherry on the cake theere could be
>
> <> ( foo/bar-1 foo/bar-5 )
I kinda tried suggesting a similar syntax, but then I realised it
couldn't work, because it implicitly says "none of these" but it
doesn't state any sort of "Pull
Robin H. Johnson posted on Mon, 07 Sep 2015 23:54:36 + as excerpted:
> I've been travelling a lot the past month (Helsinki, LA, Seattle), and
> it's on my list of stuff to do (along with finalize and announce the
> migrated git history).
[grumble grumble, top posting, tho you just followed wh
I've been travelling a lot the past month (Helsinki, LA, Seattle), and
it's on my list of stuff to do (along with finalize and announce the
migrated git history).
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 06:46:11PM +0100, malc wrote:
> I updated the scripts and since I didn't find them in a relevant
> infra-repo,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:28 AM, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 3 September 2015 at 07:17, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
> wrote:
> > Do you have specific examples?
>
>
> None that I can currently recall, I've just long resigned myself from
> trying to care with Google products. The instances I can recall were
> m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Montag, 7. September 2015, 08:40:36 schrieb Ryan Hill:
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 23:07:37 +0600 (NOVT)
>
> gro...@gentoo.org wrote:
> > WARNING: previous mirror push to host 'ituri.gentoo.org' failed, status
> > is:
> > 2015-09-03.16:57:50 962
On 9/3/15 10:16 PM, Andrew Udvare wrote:
> Chromium team is no different in this regard. No options, for anything.
> It is extremely annoying when they implement 'privacy-violating'
> features like the previously visited sites in the New tab (before you've
> entered a URL), with no option to disabl
Yup - nothing I can do about mailmap without commit access. On the
dates - I was just spitting out what git gave me... I've delved into
git help log => PRETTY FORMATS and changed it to use a unix timestamp
and reverted to the old (python default) format.
Updated script in https://bugs.gentoo.org/sh
I updated the scripts and since I didn't find them in a relevant
infra-repo, posted them to a couple of other replies to earlier week's
versions of this, cc: Robin.
I've heard nothing. I have opened
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=559894 and attached them
there.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:27
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 09/06/2015 05:10 PM, Dale wrote:
> > Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >> The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or
> >> removed from the tree, for the week ending 2015-09-06 23:59 UTC.
> >>
> >> Removals:
> >>
> >> Additions:
> >>
> >> -- Robin Hugh Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/06/2015 05:10 PM, Dale wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or
>> removed from the tree, for the week ending 2015-09-06 23:59 UTC.
>>
>> Removals:
>>
>> Additions:
>>
>> -- Robin Hug
* Michał Górny schrieb am 07.09.15 um 17:16 Uhr:
> Dnia 2015-09-07, o godz. 14:35:07
> Marc Schiffbauer napisał(a):
>
> > I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
> >
> > This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull when
> > you have a dependency on another pack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/07/2015 05:56 AM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/07/2015 07:28 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> On 09/06/2015 02:00 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>
>>> On 09/05/2015 11:23 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 09/05/2015 01:04 PM,
* Ian Stakenvicius schrieb am 07.09.15 um 16:41 Uhr:
> Why not just:
>
> DEPEND="
> dev-python/paramiko
> !~dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0
> "
>
> Depend on the package but block the individual atom(s) that don't work?
I like it. At least with the current possibilities. I was not aware that
"!~" is
* Kent Fredric schrieb am 07.09.15 um 15:18 Uhr:
> On 8 September 2015 at 00:35, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > What do you think and would is the proper way to suggest this for a new
> > EAPI? A new bug? On what
>
>
> My opposition would be I figure its more likely you want a range of
> exclusion
* Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 07.09.15 um 15:07 Uhr:
> > On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
>
> > I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
>
> > This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull
> > when you have a dependency on another package but a single
Dnia 2015-09-07, o godz. 14:35:07
Marc Schiffbauer napisał(a):
> I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
>
> This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull when
> you have a dependency on another package but a single version of it is
> not compatible for example
Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML...
> On Sep 7, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
>
> This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull when
> you have a dependency on another package but a si
On 8 September 2015 at 00:35, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> I currently have this case in app-backup/obnam which is not compatible
> to =dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0
>
> In DEPEND I now have this:
>
> !=dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0
> || ( dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0 )
>
> which does the trick, but I th
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>
> On 05/09/15 14:53, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> I was suggesting that somebody talk to the portage developers about
>> how they intend to implement EAPI6
> We don't know. But our tardiness should not retard the development of
> other package
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
> This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull
> when you have a dependency on another package but a single version
> of it is not compatible for example.
This doesn't lo
On 09/07/2015 02:35 PM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
>
> This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull when
> you have a dependency on another package but a single version of it is
> not compatible for example.
+1
Hi,
On 09/07/2015 07:28 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 09/06/2015 02:00 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> On 09/05/2015 11:23 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>>> On 09/05/2015 01:04 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>
I think cargo should probably go in dev-util with other rust
libraries an
Hi,
I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull when
you have a dependency on another package but a single version of it is
not compatible for example.
I currently have this case in app-backup/obnam which is not compat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/09/15 14:53, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I was suggesting that somebody talk to the portage developers about
> how they intend to implement EAPI6
We don't know. But our tardiness should not retard the development of
other package managers.
- --
Ale
24 matches
Mail list logo
