Re: [gentoo-dev] .gitignore

On 10 Aug 2015 08:28, Justin (jlec) wrote: > how do we maintain this file? like any other file. git add && git commit. > I like to propose to add the md5-cache into it. Which other files are of > interest? /distfiles/ /local/ /packages/ /metadata/md5-cache/ -mike signature.asc Description:

[gentoo-dev] .gitignore

Hi, how do we maintain this file? I like to propose to add the md5-cache into it. Which other files are of interest? Justin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 03:02:43 +0200 hasufell wrote: > On 08/10/2015 02:51 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > >> This is not a matter of going l33t, this is a matter of getting rid > >> of redundant and pretty much useless data all the same throug

Re: [gentoo-dev] git commit / push signing error

On 10 August 2015 at 13:40, Doug Goldstein wrote: > $ git push --signed origin master > > You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for > user: "Doug Goldstein " > 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0xA2BC03DC87ED1BD4, created 2015-04-24 > (subkey on main key ID 0x6C4E620431C9980D) > > gpg: cancel

Re: [gentoo-dev] git commit / push signing error

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote: > Hoping someone has the answer for me because I'm at a loss. I'm not > canceling the operating or hitting any key after . > > $ git push --signed origin master > > You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for > user: "Doug Goldstein " >

[gentoo-dev] git commit / push signing error

Hoping someone has the answer for me because I'm at a loss. I'm not canceling the operating or hitting any key after . $ git push --signed origin master You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for user: "Doug Goldstein " 4096-bit RSA key, ID 0xA2BC03DC87ED1BD4, created 2015-04-24

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git

On 08/10/2015 02:51 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > >> This is not a matter of going l33t, this is a matter of getting rid >> of redundant and pretty much useless data all the same through >> almost all commit messages. > > +1 > > "Gentoo-Bug: 1234

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git

> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > This is not a matter of going l33t, this is a matter of getting rid > of redundant and pretty much useless data all the same through > almost all commit messages. +1 "Gentoo-Bug: 123456" or even "Bug: 123456" is enough to uniquely identify a b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Sun, 2015-08-09 at 17:30 +0200, hasufell wrote: > On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > > On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > > > > I'd just go with "Gentoo-Bug". The X- is pointless since it was > > for eXtending Email-Headers. And what we do is only linked in > > style. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On 10 August 2015 at 11:46, hasufell wrote: > As I see it, a lot of people already stuff the bug number into the > summary and I can't really say anything against that. It gives a nice > overview when you look at it: > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/ > > Given that fact, I am not su

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/09/2015 04:46 PM, hasufell wrote: > As I see it, a lot of people already stuff the bug number into the > summary and I can't really say anything against that. It gives a > nice overview when you look at it: > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/ge

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-09 23:59 UTC

The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2015-08-09 23:59 UTC. Removals: dev-ruby/dotenv-deployment 2015-08-03 22:48:57 mrueg dev-util/travis-yaml2015-08-03 22:50:36 mrueg app-text/migemo

[gentoo-dev] Re: Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:44:09 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 21:56:05 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29 > > hasufell napisał(a): > > > > > On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote: > > > > commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1 >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/09/2015 02:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 23:01:32 hasufell > napisał(a): > >> On 08/09/2015 09:56 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29 hasufell >>> napisał(a): >>> On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/09/2015 11:49 AM, Davide Pesavento wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Mike Gilbert > wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell >> wrote: >>> On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: Hi! On Sun, 09 Aug 20

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

As I see it, a lot of people already stuff the bug number into the summary and I can't really say anything against that. It gives a nice overview when you look at it: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/ Given that fact, I am not sure we can convince people to repeat the bug number in th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:40:44 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > > Which is terribly redundant. Just put the whole bug URL. Advantages: > > > > > > - keeps the bug namespaced to bugs.gentoo.org, > > > - has the bug no inside, > > > - is convenient -- you can click it instead of copy-pasting the no. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

Dnia 2015-08-10, o godz. 00:44:09 Andrew Savchenko napisał(a): > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 21:56:05 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29 > > hasufell napisał(a): > > > > > On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote: > > > > commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24

[gentoo-dev] Re: Git Migration: go-live!

On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 13:22:43 +0200 hasufell wrote: > On 08/09/2015 12:16 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 + > > "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:39:52PM +, Robin H. Jo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: kde-base/kdepim-icons/

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 20:42:00 +0200 hasufell wrote: >> On 08/09/2015 08:25 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: >> > commit: 3fd6580a947db519cb60a4c2a05ec380ceb681d8 >> > Author: Agostino Sarubbo gentoo org> >> > AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 18:23

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: kde-base/{akonadi,kdepim-strigi-analyzer}

Konsole output Konsole output # Johannes Huber (10 Aug 2015) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Not needed anymore for # KDE Old PIM 4.4.2015.06. kde-base/akonadi kde-base/kdepim-strigi-analyzer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 21:04:35 + Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 01:16:19PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > Out of curiosity, is it impossible to have a read only CVS server with > > > the state at the time of the freeze? > > Seconded here. Read-only CVS should not consume m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 21:56:05 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29 > hasufell napisał(a): > > > On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote: > > > commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1 > > > Author: Michael Weber gentoo org> > > > AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: kde-base/kdepim-icons/

On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 20:42:00 +0200 hasufell wrote: > On 08/09/2015 08:25 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > commit: 3fd6580a947db519cb60a4c2a05ec380ceb681d8 > > Author: Agostino Sarubbo gentoo org> > > AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 18:23:44 2015 + > > Commit: Agostino Sarubbo gentoo org> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > X-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557022 How about just: Bug-URL: xxx or Bug: xxx X- is not recommended as a prefix for the various reasons already well-stated by the IETF in the previously-linked RFC. -- Rich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 23:01:32 hasufell napisał(a): > On 08/09/2015 09:56 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29 > > hasufell napisał(a): > > > >> On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote: > >>> commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1 > >>> Author:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 01:16:19PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > Out of curiosity, is it impossible to have a read only CVS server with > > the state at the time of the freeze? > Seconded here. Read-only CVS should not consume much resources, but > will facilitate migration. Read-only access t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On 08/09/2015 09:56 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29 > hasufell napisał(a): > >> On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote: >>> commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1 >>> Author: Michael Weber gentoo org> >>> AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 13:58:26 2015 +0

[gentoo-dev] Re: useflag policies

> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sergey Popov wrote: > > In short - apropriate REQUIRED_USE with setting recommended > USE-flag(e.g. USE="+qt4 qt5" or USE="qt4 +qt5") > > That's most painless decision for both developers and users. Developers > do not need to maintain ugly dependencies like > DEPEN

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: useflag policies

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Sergey Popov wrote: > > > In short - apropriate REQUIRED_USE with setting recommended > USE-flag(e.g. USE="+qt4 qt5" or USE="qt4 +qt5") > > > > That's most painless decision for both developers and users. Developers > do not need to maintain ugly dependencies lik

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: useflag policies

On Sun, 2015-08-09 at 22:38 +0300, Sergey Popov wrote: > > > In short - apropriate REQUIRED_USE with setting recommended > USE-flag(e.g. USE="+qt4 qt5" or USE="qt4 +qt5") > > If a package has optional guis, why should users of the default profile get any gui enabled by default? The default pro

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/08/2015 10:36 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:39:52PM +, Robin H. Johnson >> wrote: >>> 2015/08/08 15:00 UTC - Freeze 2015/08/08 19:00 UTC - Git >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 16:09:29 hasufell napisał(a): > On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote: > > commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1 > > Author: Michael Weber gentoo org> > > AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 13:58:26 2015 + > > Commit: Michael Weber gentoo org> > >

[gentoo-dev] Re: useflag policies

In short - apropriate REQUIRED_USE with setting recommended USE-flag(e.g. USE="+qt4 qt5" or USE="qt4 +qt5") That's most painless decision for both developers and users. Developers do not need to maintain ugly dependencies like DEPEND="qt4 ? ( qt5 ( dev-qt/qtcore:5 ) !qt5 ( dev-qt/qtcore:4 ) )

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: kde-base/kdepim-icons/

On 08/09/2015 08:59 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On Sunday 09 August 2015 20:42:00 hasufell wrote: >> So, now we have 21 commits with the exact same commit message: >> = >> Stable for amd64, wrt bug #556974 >> = >> >> At that point, it's even debatable to have separate commits. >> >> IMO,

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: kde-base/kdepim-icons/

On Sunday 09 August 2015 20:42:00 hasufell wrote: > So, now we have 21 commits with the exact same commit message: > = > Stable for amd64, wrt bug #556974 > = > > At that point, it's even debatable to have separate commits. > > IMO, if you stabilize a huge chunk of ebuilds, you have two p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell wrote: >> On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> I t

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: kde-base/kdepim-icons/

On 08/09/2015 08:25 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > commit: 3fd6580a947db519cb60a4c2a05ec380ceb681d8 > Author: Agostino Sarubbo gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 18:23:44 2015 + > Commit: Agostino Sarubbo gentoo org> > CommitDate: Sun Aug 9 18:23:44 2015 + > URL:ht

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-kernel/dracut looking for more maintainers

Hi, prometheanfire, chutzpah and Alexander will take care of Dracut. I will just serve with advice and keep an eye on changes. Thanks, -- Amadeusz Żołnowski signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tool

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: > Hi! > > On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that parse commit messages. >>> >>> I don't. Jus

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

Hi! On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > > I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that > > > parse commit messages. > > > > I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On 08/09/2015 05:03 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >>> I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that >>> parse commit messages. >> >> I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all >> purposes, ev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier for tools that > > parse commit messages. > > I don't. Just the "bug " prefix should be fine for almost all > purposes, even for tools. I'm pretty sure the majority of dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Michael Weber wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 08/09/2015 07:36 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> I'm only 90% sure that everything works, but I've spent almost the >> entire day on it, and there's more to go tomorrow. > Thanks a lot! >

Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 09:10:30AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > We shouldn't do anything (besides adapting repoman to the $Id$ format) > without some discussion first. However... > > Do we really need to have ANY keywords in our files? Keyword > expansion was just a PITA all-around with cvs. Do

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git workflow, commit messages

On 8/9/15 10:31 AM, Gordon Pettey wrote: On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: Particularly, we should prepend "CATEGORY/PN: " to the first line so we can easily search git log for what happened to a package. Good format to help reading unfiltered logs, but invalid reason

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On 08/09/2015 10:43 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:38 PM, hasufell wrote: >>> I don't really see why it has to be so verbose. Can we just make it >>> "bug 557022", or even #557022? That would also make it fit better if >>> you have a single-line commit message only. >> >> I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On 08/09/2015 04:43 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:38 PM, hasufell wrote: >>> I don't really see why it has to be so verbose. Can we just make it >>> "bug 557022", or even #557022? That would also make it fit better if >>> you have a single-line commit message only. >> >> I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git workflow, commit messages

On 08/09/2015 04:31 PM, Gordon Pettey wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Anthony G. Basile > wrote: > > > Particularly, we should prepend "CATEGORY/PN: " to the first line so > we can easily search git log for what happened to a package. > > > Good for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:38 PM, hasufell wrote: >> I don't really see why it has to be so verbose. Can we just make it >> "bug 557022", or even #557022? That would also make it fit better if >> you have a single-line commit message only. > > I think "X-Gentoo-Bug: 557022" also makes the job easier

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Git Migration: go-live!

On 09 Aug 2015 12:18, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > 1) The git workflow [1] does not mention to add PORTAGE_GPG_KEY to make.conf > and neither to use the long gpg key. Does the short create a problem? it does not > 2) The git workflow [1] says to do git config --local commit.gpgsign 1 - Do > we >

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Git Migration: go-live!

On Sunday 09 August 2015 05:36:16 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Quick instructions: > Set PORTAGE_GPG_KEY="0xLONG-GPG-KEY" in your make.conf > $ git config user.signingkey 0xLONG-GPG-KEY > $ git clone git+ssh://g...@git.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git > $ vim ... > $ repoman commit -m '...' [2] > $ git pus

Re: [gentoo-core] [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 12:04:43 +0200 Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote: > El 09/08/15 a las 12:02, Mike Frysinger escribió: > > On 09 Aug 2015 11:31, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > >> * Michael Weber schrieb am 09.08.15 um 11:00 Uhr: > >>> On 08/09/2015 07:36 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > >>>

Re: [gentoo-core] [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

El 09/08/15 a las 12:02, Mike Frysinger escribió: > On 09 Aug 2015 11:31, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: >> * Michael Weber schrieb am 09.08.15 um 11:00 Uhr: >>> On 08/09/2015 07:36 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: I'm only 90% sure that everything works, but I've spent almost the entire day on it,

Re: [gentoo-core] [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

On 09 Aug 2015 11:31, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > * Michael Weber schrieb am 09.08.15 um 11:00 Uhr: > > On 08/09/2015 07:36 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > I'm only 90% sure that everything works, but I've spent almost the > > > entire day on it, and there's more to go tomorrow. > > Thanks a lot!

Re: [gentoo-core] [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

* Michael Weber schrieb am 09.08.15 um 11:00 Uhr: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 08/09/2015 07:36 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > I'm only 90% sure that everything works, but I've spent almost the > > entire day on it, and there's more to go tomorrow. > Thanks a lot! >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git workflow, commit messages

On 2015-08-09 09:31, Gordon Pettey wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Anthony G. Basile > wrote: > > > > > Particularly, we should prepend "CATEGORY/PN: " to the first line so we > > can easily search git log for what happened to a package. > > > > > Good format to help reading unfiltered l

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On 08/09/2015 04:26 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, hasufell wrote: >> I was wondering if we should set a standard for referencing bug reports. >> The portage team already does something like that: >> https://github.com/gentoo/portage/commit/b7149002bf23889f280c502afe6

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git workflow, commit messages

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > Particularly, we should prepend "CATEGORY/PN: " to the first line so we > can easily search git log for what happened to a package. > > Good format to help reading unfiltered logs, but invalid reasoning. 'git log portage/cat/pn' or 'git

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, hasufell wrote: > I was wondering if we should set a standard for referencing bug reports. > The portage team already does something like that: > https://github.com/gentoo/portage/commit/b7149002bf23889f280c502afe6ceda0b1345ca3 > > Following that, the commit could h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On 9 August 2015 at 15:09, hasufell wrote: > On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote: > > commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1 > > Author: Michael Weber gentoo org> > > AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 13:58:26 2015 + > > Commit: Michael Weber gentoo org> > > CommitDate:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: media-video/handbrake/files/, media-video/handbrake/

On 9 August 2015 at 15:01, hasufell wrote: > On 08/09/2015 03:43 PM, Ian Whyman wrote: > > commit: b8f141afeb0e183298fe227672ac9338e0e8e12c > > Author: Ian Whyman gentoo org> > > AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 12:30:22 2015 + > > Commit: Ian Whyman gentoo org> > > CommitDate: Sun Aug

[gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On 08/09/2015 03:58 PM, Michael Weber wrote: > commit: 40b3fd64ec9c5d6d94f0f0897740bc77622c24a1 > Author: Michael Weber gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 13:58:26 2015 + > Commit: Michael Weber gentoo org> > CommitDate: Sun Aug 9 13:58:26 2015 + > URL:https://git

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: media-video/handbrake/files/, media-video/handbrake/

On 08/09/2015 03:43 PM, Ian Whyman wrote: > commit: b8f141afeb0e183298fe227672ac9338e0e8e12c > Author: Ian Whyman gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 12:30:22 2015 + > Commit: Ian Whyman gentoo org> > CommitDate: Sun Aug 9 13:43:25 2015 + > URL:https://gitweb.gento

Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 09 Aug 2015 14:54, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: >> Hi all! > > please don't top post > >> Current repoman complains about headers in ebuilds >> >> >>> Creating Manifest for /home/alexxy/Gentoo/gentoo/sys-cluster/open-mx >>ebuild.badheader

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: net-misc/dropbear/, net-misc/dropbear/files/

On 08/09/2015 02:56 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > commit: ceef36bd30b9f9ac1e58450fc434344fb964fd95 > Author: Mike Frysinger gentoo org> > AuthorDate: Sun Aug 9 08:34:29 2015 + > Commit: Mike Frysinger gentoo org> > CommitDate: Sun Aug 9 12:56:21 2015 + > URL:https://

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git workflow, commit messages

On 08/09/2015 02:06 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I hate to be a nag, but please read > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow. In particular, commit > messages. I'm seeing lots of cvs style messages going in and without > history it will be hard to figure out what ha

Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

Mike Frysinger писал 09-08-2015 15:43: On 09 Aug 2015 14:54, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: Hi all! please don't top post Current repoman complains about headers in ebuilds >>> Creating Manifest for /home/alexxy/Gentoo/gentoo/sys-cluster/open-mx ebuild.badheader 1 sys-cluster/op

Re: [gentoo-scm] Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

On 09 Aug 2015 14:54, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: > Hi all! please don't top post > Current repoman complains about headers in ebuilds > > >>> Creating Manifest for /home/alexxy/Gentoo/gentoo/sys-cluster/open-mx >ebuild.badheader 1 > sys-cluster/open-mx/open-mx-1.5.4.ebuild: Malf

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git workflow, commit messages

Sunday 09 Aug 2015 20:17:57, Patrick Lauer wrote : > On Sunday 09 August 2015 08:06:53 Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I hate to be a nag, but please read > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow. In particular, commit > > messages. I'm seeing lots of cvs style mess

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git workflow, commit messages

"Anthony G. Basile" napisał: >Hi everyone, > >I hate to be a nag, but please read >https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow. In particular, >commit >messages. I'm seeing lots of cvs style messages going in and without >history it will be hard to figure out what happened just from t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git workflow, commit messages

On Sunday 09 August 2015 08:06:53 Anthony G. Basile wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I hate to be a nag, but please read > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow. In particular, commit > messages. I'm seeing lots of cvs style messages going in and without > history it will be hard to figure o

[gentoo-dev] Git workflow, commit messages

Hi everyone, I hate to be a nag, but please read https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow. In particular, commit messages. I'm seeing lots of cvs style messages going in and without history it will be hard to figure out what happened just from the message. Particularly, we should p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Git Migration: go-live!

On 08/09/2015 01:55 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > On 2015-08-09 13:22, hasufell wrote: >> On 08/09/2015 12:16 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: >>> On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 + >>> "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: >>> On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 02, 20

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Git Migration: go-live!

On 2015-08-09 13:22, hasufell wrote: > On 08/09/2015 12:16 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 + > > "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:39:52PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

Hi all! Current repoman complains about headers in ebuilds Creating Manifest for /home/alexxy/Gentoo/gentoo/sys-cluster/open-mx ebuild.badheader 1 sys-cluster/open-mx/open-mx-1.5.4.ebuild: Malformed CVS Header on line: 3 So may be its better to drop $Id: $ completely? Rob

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Git Migration: go-live!

On 08/09/2015 12:16 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 + > "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:39:52PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: 2015/08/08 15:00 UTC - Freeze 2015/08/08

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: launch plan & schedule (2015/Aug/08-09)

08.08.2015 20:47, Robin H. Johnson пишет: > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:39:52PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> 2015/08/08 15:00 UTC - Freeze >> 2015/08/08 19:00 UTC - Git commits open for developers >> 2015/08/09 01:00 UTC - Rsync live again (with lagged changelog) >> 2015/08/11 - His

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Git Migration: go-live!

On 09 Aug 2015 04:16, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 + "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:39:52PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > > 2015/08/08 15:00 UTC - Freeze > > > > 2015/08/08

[gentoo-dev] Re: Git Migration: go-live!

On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 05:36:16 + "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:39:52PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > 2015/08/08 15:00 UTC - Freeze > > > 2015/08/08 19:00 UTC - Git commits open for developers >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 08/09/2015 07:36 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > I'm only 90% sure that everything works, but I've spent almost the > entire day on it, and there's more to go tomorrow. Thanks a lot! use case: my cvs tree had uncommitted ebuild work (yes, you caug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Git Migration: go-live!

Hi, Great work! Semi-related question though... Dnia 2015-08-09, o godz. 05:36:16 "Robin H. Johnson" napisał(a): > On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:47:14PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > [...] > Quick instructions: > Set PORTAGE_GPG_KEY="0xLONG-GPG-KEY" in your make.conf > $ git config user.signing