Re: [gentoo-dev] ELT-patches from overlay?

2015-05-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 11 May 2015 22:44, Benda Xu wrote: > In libtool.eclass[1], it is mentioned in the comments of elt_patch_dir() > that > > # If an overlay has eclass overrides, but doesn't actually override the > # libtool.eclass, we'll have ECLASSDIR pointing to the active overlay's > # eclass/ dir, but libtool

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail

2015-05-12 Thread Niels Dettenbach
Am Dienstag, 12. Mai 2015, 06:26:41 schrieb Rich Freeman: > I find email an incredibly frustrating experience all-around. It > works great as long as everybody doesn't use anybody for hosting who > isn't in the top-10 provider list, and doesn't use a mailing list. This is NOT true! Our mail syste

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail

2015-05-12 Thread Peter Stuge
Rich Freeman wrote: > I find email an incredibly frustrating experience all-around. It > works great as long as everybody doesn't use anybody for hosting who > isn't in the top-10 provider list, and doesn't use a mailing list. DMARC marks top-10 essentially creating their own walled email garden.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail

2015-05-12 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Eray Aslan wrote: > > The correct solution is to stop forwarding spam and the easiest way is > just stopping forwarding. There are valid policy reasons for not going > that route but continuing forwarding because it is too difficult to > configure gmail is, well,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail

2015-05-12 Thread Amadeusz Żołnowski
"Robin H. Johnson" writes: > TL;DR: As of May 17, @gentoo.org will drop incoming spammy mail > instead of delivering it. Speak now or hold your peace. Please no. Even Gmail has sometimes false positives. It is good enough that Spamassassin marks mails and every user can set up rule either to de

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail

2015-05-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
hmm, of the ~90k messages i have in my local dir from ~7 years, it looks like ~20 would have been incorrectly thrown away. i can live with that. -mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Anti-spam changes: proposal to drop spammy mail

2015-05-12 Thread Niels Dettenbach
Am Montag, 11. Mai 2015, 20:36:18 schrieb Robin H. Johnson: > There are people that still accept mail that violates standards? yes, and there are mail sites and/or mail clients sending standard violating emails. But the more truth is that there are many points within standards which are interpret