The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2015-04-26 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
net-mail/git-mailz 2015-04-22 14:49:11 yac
games-kids/memonix-bin 2015-04-23 22:44:23 mr_bones_
app-admin/chef
On 25 April 2015 at 16:57, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Of course, one thing that could make the process faster would be if C++
> based packages were marked some way.
revdep-rebuild --soname 'libstdc\+\+.so.*'
should do the trick. Stuff that does not link the library (statically
linke
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:04:11 -0400
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > Currently, a problem is that everybody uses different formatting
> > for stabilization bug reports making them more difficult to be
> > parsed.
> >
>
> For clarity, are we talkin
El dom, 26-04-2015 a las 08:04 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > Currently, a problem is that everybody uses different formatting
> > for stabilization bug reports making them more difficult to be parsed.
> >
>
> For clarity, are we talkin
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> Currently, a problem is that everybody uses different formatting
> for stabilization bug reports making them more difficult to be parsed.
>
For clarity, are we talking about parsing by a human brain, or parsing
by a computer program?
If the
El sáb, 11-04-2015 a las 21:50 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> the debate about arches, keywording and stabilization procedures is coming up
> again.
>
> People have told me that the whole debate seems to turn into some sort of
> arch-team bashing. That is definitely not the
# Hans de Graaff (26 Apr 2015)
# Ruby packages that only work with ruby19. Masked for removal in 30
# days.
#
# Only compatible with ruby19.
app-misc/booh
# Only compatible with ruby19. New versions bring in many new
# dependencies and this would require a dedicated maintainer.
dev-ruby/adhearsio
