Re: [gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug?

2015-04-20 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:57:16 +0600 (NOVT) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > However, after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the > user-supplyed ${CFLAGS}. And the upstream CFLAGS contain -O3. There is your problem. We filter out those compiler flags that affect the output, so -O3 should go

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug?

2015-04-20 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:57:16 +0600 (NOVT) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > Hello *, > > There was a bug #526194 - dev-lisp/sbcl does not respect CFLAGS. It was > "fixed" by Mark Wright on Jan 31 - Feb 1. However, > after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the user-supplyed > ${CFLAGS

[gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug?

2015-04-20 Thread grozin
Hello *, There was a bug #526194 - dev-lisp/sbcl does not respect CFLAGS. It was "fixed" by Mark Wright on Jan 31 - Feb 1. However, after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the user-supplyed ${CFLAGS}. And the upstream CFLAGS contain -O3. So, is a user has, e.g., -O2 in his/her ${

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Service relaunch: anongit.gentoo.org; anonymous git checkouts via git:// and http://

2015-04-20 Thread Robin H. Johnson
FYI, I have now turned off the old hostnames. git://overlays.gentoo.org/ git://*.overlays.gentoo.org/ git://anon.gentoo.org/ git+ssh://overlays.gentoo.org/ git+ssh://*.overlays.gentoo.org/ On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:42:54AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Full anonymous Git service has returned.