[gentoo-dev] Re: Review: Apache AddHandler news item

2015-03-26 Thread Duncan
Sebastian Pipping posted on Thu, 26 Mar 2015 19:15:09 +0100 as excerpted: > Changes: > > * Revision bump This ^^.. > * Add section on .php.inc > > * Add thanks line > > > > Title: Apache AddHandler vulnerability protection

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-26 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> >> The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several >> other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions >> according to our small files installatio

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-26 Thread Alex Brandt
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 13:17:02 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several > > other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions > > according to our small files installa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted

2015-03-26 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 15.03.2015 10:48, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> If we want a separate repo/ namespace, we would probably need to >> consider moving other repositories there -- at least the >> official ones. Of course, it would be a nice result, having >> everything hosted on git.g.o as git.g.o/repo/${repo_name}.git

Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted

2015-03-26 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 14.03.2015 23:25, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Trying to explain to a new user that the Portage tree refers to the > collection of ebuilds used by a PMS-compliant package manager (eg > Portage) is problematic. Full ack. Let's limit "portage" to the piece of software, please. > Questions: 0. Wha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: Apache AddHandler news item

2015-03-26 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 26.03.2015 20:50, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > * Sebastian Pipping schrieb am 26.03.15 um 19:15 Uhr: >> As of the momment, affected packages include: > ^ Typo Thanks. Fixed in my local copy. No need to re-paste, I believe. Best, Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted

2015-03-26 Thread Kent Fredric
On 27 March 2015 at 10:32, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > It would be great to logically separate ebuild repositories (main tree and > overlays) somehow logically from code, data, ... > > How about adding an additional level "repo" for everything that contains > ebuild trees? > > repo/gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted

2015-03-26 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 > Questions: > 0. What names for the tree/repository. > 1. We have some namespaces in Git: proj, dev, priv, data, sites, exp; > should the tree be in one of those namespaces, a new namespace, or be > without a namespace? git://anongit.gentoo.org/NEW-

[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 101 bugs

2015-03-26 Thread Alex Alexander
Our bug queue has 101 bugs! If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 Thanks!

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: Apache AddHandler news item

2015-03-26 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Sebastian Pipping schrieb am 26.03.15 um 19:15 Uhr: As of the momment, affected packages include: ^ Typo -- 0x35A64134 - 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: Apache AddHandler news item

2015-03-26 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 26.03.2015 18:02, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > The most important reason is missing =) > > If you are relying on the AddHandler behavior to execute > secret_database_stuff.php.inc, then once the change is made, Apache will > begin serving up your database credentials in plain text. Good point.

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-26 Thread William Hubbs
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 01:17:02PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > > > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several > > other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions > > according to our small files

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-26 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several > other packages -- e.g. unconditionally installing the completions > according to our small files installation practice and not reflecting > the rdepend on app-shells/zs

[gentoo-dev] x11-libs/libXaw3dXft up for grabs

2015-03-26 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
x11-libs/libXaw3dXft is up for grabs, as the x11 team is not interested in maintaining this package. The only reverse dependency of this package is media-gfx/xpaint.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review: Apache AddHandler news item

2015-03-26 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 03/26/2015 12:56 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > > Why this news entry? > The most important reason is missing =) If you are relying on the AddHandler behavior to execute secret_database_stuff.php.inc, then once the change is made, Apache will begin serving up your database credentials in pla

[gentoo-dev] Review: Apache AddHandler news item

2015-03-26 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hi! In context of https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=538822 mjo and agreed that a portage news item would be a good idea. Please review my proposal below. Thank you! Best, Sebastian === Title: Apache AddHandler vulnerability

[gentoo-dev] rfc: zsh completions -- optional or mandatory?

2015-03-26 Thread William Hubbs
All, I'm seeing at least two ways of handling zsh completion files in the tree. The first is in a package I maintain and several others in the tree -- using the zsh-completion use flag along with an rdepend on app-shells/zsh behind the use flag. The package I maintain that does this is www-client

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-admin/eselect-nxserver, net-misc/{neatx,nxcl,nxclient,nxnode,nxsadmin,nxserver-freeedition,nxserver-freenx,qtnx}

2015-03-26 Thread Bernard Cafarelli
# Bernard Cafarelli (26 Mar 2015) # Dead upstreams, not working in some use cases, # compatibility with current net-misc/nx not guaranteed, # some bundle old binary Xorg code that may be vulnerable, # modern alternative exist: # net-misc/x2go{client,server} and proprietary NX 4 (bug #488334) # Th

[gentoo-dev] Thoughts about LUA_TARGETS

2015-03-26 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
Hi! As you can be noticed, Lua packages, just like Python, PHP or Ruby ones, supports "slotted" behaviour (with some side notes). As far as we have nice *_TARGETS for languages above (without standardised naming syntax, although), we still do not have such for Lua. Rafael's main argument is abou