"Paweł Hajdan, Jr." writes:
> Awesome work!
>
> I was always proud about Gentoo's mailing list archives - no spam,
> simple UI.
>
> Just wanted to say thanks to a3li, and entire Infra team. Oh, and the
> new design looks great.
Second that. Thanks a3li and infra. Good job.
BTW, I love the lin
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> While discussing the issue in #-releng, it was also suggested that a
> news item should be prepared, to inform users that they cannot rely on
> USE=bindist. (They cannot rely on it already now, though.) Does it
> make sense to have a news ite
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 20:51:44 +0800
Ben de Groot wrote:
> Alexis, can you shed some light on this from the TeX side? What font
> formats can be used by various TeX packages?
Ahah :)
Short answer: All. More or less properly depending on the font and its
format.
More detailed answer:
http://en.wi
On 1 March 2015 at 23:36, Guilherme Amadio wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 08:59:38PM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> On 28 February 2015 at 19:52, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> > On 02/28/2015 01:47 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> >>
>> >> If we do the use expand, we should leave it up for users to set.
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> from the rest of your email, I understand that RESTRICT=bindist is
> eapi0 (or even not covered by eapi?), right?
> is there any information on RESTRICT=bindist ? with these 150
> packages using it, this sounds like something well known that I had
On 03/04/2015 02:56 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:57:40PM +0200, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> One that that I miss though is the git (+ssh) links for rw access
>> to the repositories. It's not obvious what url to use to clone a
>> repository for rw access. Is there a way to
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 22:12:07 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
> We currently have two mechanisms to influence building of packages
> that cannot be binary redistributed. Some 150 packages have
> RESTRICT=bindist (unconditional, or USE conditional), whereas
> 27 packages have the bindist flag in t
On 2/25/15 8:38 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> I would like to remove the elog for a couple of reasons:
>
> 1. The use flag description is there for whoever cares to read it.
> There is no need to alert the user every time.
> 2. We are not lawyers, and I have no business giving legal advice
> about pat
