> On Wed, 4 Mar 2015, Robin H Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:12:07PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> However, it turned out that some 10 packages are using the bindist
>> flag only in REQUIRED_USE but nowhere else [2] (with foo being some
>> feature flag):
>>
>> IUSE="bindist foo
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:12:07PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> So a few days ago I filed bug 541408 and dependent bugs, with the goal
> that ebuilds with the bindist flag in their IUSE should also add
> RESTRICT="!bindist? ( bindist )". However, it turned out that some 10
> packages are using th
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:57:40PM +0200, Markos Chandras wrote:
> One that that I miss though is the git (+ssh) links for rw access to the
> repositories. It's not obvious what url to use to clone a repository for
> rw access. Is there a way to generate such urls on the web interface?
It does clea
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> IMHO, the bindist USE flag is redundant in these cases. So we should
>> get rid of the REQUIRED_USE and add a restriction instead:
>>
>>IUSE="foo"
>>RESTRICT="foo? ( bindist )"
>
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> IMHO, the bindist USE flag is redundant in these cases. So we should
> get rid of the REQUIRED_USE and add a restriction instead:
>
>IUSE="foo"
>RESTRICT="foo? ( bindist )"
>
> What do you think? Should we proceed in this direction?
On 03/03/2015 04:14 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Another week, another service...
>
> The Gentoo Infra team now presents the relaunched Git web interface, now
> hosted at: gitweb.gentoo.org.
>
> It's cgit-based, but has working redirects for all prior gitweb
> locations:
> http://git.gentoo.org
Hi,
We currently have two mechanisms to influence building of packages
that cannot be binary redistributed. Some 150 packages have
RESTRICT=bindist (unconditional, or USE conditional), whereas
27 packages have the bindist flag in their IUSE. Until very recently,
the two sets were practically disjoi
Le 26/02/2015 17:08, Michael Mair-Keimberger a écrit :
net-misc/qtnx & net-misc/nxcl (bug #537774 & #537778)
Both ebuilds fetch the same source code and my first though was we have
the same package under two different names. I might be wrong here as i
didn't looked into it. However since the las
