Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-20 Thread Peter Stuge
Rich Freeman wrote: > How about "contact" instead of team. > there is no meaning to a contact besides being CC'ed on bugs. Please simply call it cc then? :) //Peter

Re: [gentoo-dev] metadata.xml un-ization, v2

2014-12-20 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:23:57 +0100 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:59:26 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > On Tue, 9 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > As for the exact details, I've pretty much decided to go for > > > featurism here, IOW making everyone happy. It als

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug №504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh

2014-12-20 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Сергей wrote: > I see. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo-functions/pull/2 It is my pull > request. > Seems like these packages' maintainers are busy solving other problems now. > If this really gets in somebody's way they will just post a notice in the affected pa

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug №504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh

2014-12-20 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Сергей wrote: > But I think it is possible to make "gentoo-functions" ebuild also copy > "functions.sh" to "/etc/init.d/" as a temporary workaround. This has been discussed with the maintainer of gentoo-functions; he prefers to take the long (and possibly safer)

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: Various mate 1.6 related packages

2014-12-20 Thread Matthias Maier
As we have a stable mate 1.8 desktop and mate 1.6 related packages start to pick up a bunch of outstanding issues, I've remove all 1.6 version for mate packages from the tree. The following list contains mate-1.6-only packages that will be removed: # Matthias Maier (20 Dec 2014) # Remove obsolet

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug №504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh

2014-12-20 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Сергей wrote: > There is a bug (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504116). > Though it had been reported long time ago, many bugs, which this bug > depends on, are not even confirmed (see my comment: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504116#c3). There

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: Various further ruby-1.9 only packages

2014-12-20 Thread Manuel Rüger
Next round of ruby-1.9 only removal # Manuel Rüger (20 Dec 2014) # Mask further ruby-1.9 only packages. # Removal in 30 days dev-ruby/awesome_nested_set dev-ruby/directory_watcher dev-ruby/gem_plugin dev-ruby/mysql-ruby dev-ruby/refe dev-ruby/tmail dev-ruby/twitter:4 signature.asc Descripti