Hi,
I've dropped myself as maintainer of app-emulation/vagrant as I have no
time or interest to try debundling the path that upstream has taken and
rarely use it anyway.
If someone is interested, feel free to pick it up and reassign bugs
466344 and 505124 to yourself. However, my advice to those
On 12/13/2014 10:10 AM, Diamond wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:44:21 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> Dnia 2014-12-11, o godz. 11:36:29
>> Michał Górny napisał(a):
>>
>>> Hello, everyone.
>>>
>>> Following a similar change in distutils-r1, I would like to remove
>>> the parallel run support in
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 09:44:21 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-12-11, o godz. 11:36:29
> Michał Górny napisał(a):
>
> > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > Following a similar change in distutils-r1, I would like to remove
> > the parallel run support in multilib eclasses, and effectively from
> > mu
Hi everyone... I received this email to my personal email account.
I don't know how I got on their list... but I am forwarding a somewhat
chopped version of their html email to the list. I removed a bunch of
the html stuff (pics, etc.) not relevant to the basic message.
If your interested, click o
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2014, Michał Górny wrote:
> Not sure if we want to keep split build logs now. Their main purpose
> was making around parallel runs readable. However, they still allow
> you to easily trace build for one variant.
Kill them. Splitting build.log is trivial if things are sequenti
Dnia 2014-12-11, o godz. 11:36:29
Michał Górny napisał(a):
> Hello, everyone.
>
> Following a similar change in distutils-r1, I would like to remove
> the parallel run support in multilib eclasses, and effectively from
> multibuild completely.
>
> The goal is to make things simpler, and follow
