Re: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree

2014-11-18 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le 19/11/2014 03:17, Alec Ten Harmsel a écrit : > Hey devs, Hi Alec, > This is my first mail to this list. If this is out of line, let me know. Not out of line on the topic/content, but try to avoid sending 3MB attachments to hundreds (thousands?) of people. > * 9233 ebuilds that use a deprecat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree

2014-11-18 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 19 November 2014 02:17, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > * So many (~3MB output) warnings, especially "upstream parallel > compilation bug"... thought autoconf handled this, but I guess not Autoconf has little to nothing to do with parallel make. If you're curious: https://blog.flameeyes.eu/tag/forap

Re: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree

2014-11-18 Thread Alec Ten Harmsel
On 11/18/2014 09:38 PM, Brian Evans wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/18/2014 09:17 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: >> Hey devs, >> >> This is my first mail to this list. If this is out of line, let me >> know. >> >> I've been playing around with Jenkins (continuous in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree

2014-11-18 Thread Brian Evans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/18/2014 09:17 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > Hey devs, > > This is my first mail to this list. If this is out of line, let me > know. > > I've been playing around with Jenkins (continuous integration > server) recently for a couple of personal p

Re: [gentoo-dev] Running repoman on the portage tree

2014-11-18 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > * So many (~3MB output) warnings, especially "upstream parallel > compilation bug"... thought autoconf handled this, but I guess not You still have to specify dependencies with automake, and it's pretty easy to forget a dependency and not

Re: [gentoo-dev] ROS (Robot Operating System) Overlay for Gentoo

2014-11-18 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
В письме от Вт, 18 ноября 2014 14:38:12 пользователь Wayne Chang написал: > Hi All, hi > What's the best way to get this > repository recognized as an official overlay? Create a bug on bz to include in in the oficial layman list. Like this: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=444666 or this:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog cuda.eclass

2014-11-18 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-11-18, o godz. 19:44:02 "Justin Lecher (jlec)" napisał(a): > jlec14/11/18 19:44:02 > > Modified: ChangeLog cuda.eclass > Log: > Fix gcc detection when using multislot, #529710 > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.1427 eclass/ChangeLog > > file :

[gentoo-dev] ROS (Robot Operating System) Overlay for Gentoo

2014-11-18 Thread Wayne Chang
Hi All, I got the latest ROS version running on Gentoo and packaged it into an overlay. The closest overlay was ezod (http://www.mavrinac.com/index.cgi?page=gentoo), but it wasn't getting much love. The maintainers at ROS were kind enough to set up a repo under their organization: https://github

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Implicit system dependency

2014-11-18 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > >> On Nov 17, 2014, at 7:03 PM, hasufell wrote: >> >>> On 11/18/2014 12:47 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >>> Am Dienstag, 18. November 2014, 00:38:36 schrieb hasufell: >>> >>> We just don't want to answer a thousand >>> questions when t

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed model

2014-11-18 Thread Jauhien Piatlicki
On 11/18/2014 03:02 PM, viv...@gmail.com wrote: > Il 18/11/2014 14:12, Jauhien Piatlicki ha scritto: >> On 11/18/2014 04:19 AM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: >>> Jauhien Piatlicki writes: >>> It would be probably good to have in the tree only the core components and move other stuff to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed model

2014-11-18 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 18/11/2014 14:12, Jauhien Piatlicki ha scritto: > On 11/18/2014 04:19 AM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: >> Jauhien Piatlicki writes: >> >>> It would be probably good to have in the tree only the core components and >>> move other stuff to the thematic overlays. >>> >>> Then we can have a clear und

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed model

2014-11-18 Thread Jauhien Piatlicki
On 11/18/2014 04:19 AM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: > Jauhien Piatlicki writes: > >> It would be probably good to have in the tree only the core components and >> move other stuff to the thematic overlays. >> >> Then we can have a clear understanding, how things should be: if >> something is a pa