Excuse the top posting.
You don't need to strip the HTML. Change the extension to whatever.log and
it's already there in unmangled text.
On 2 Nov 2014 01:10, "Ian Stakenvicius" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 01/11/14 03:53 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El sáb, 01-
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
>
>> The newest member of Gentoo can have more power to direct the course
>> of the distro than every oldtimer or council member there is, if they
>> just contribute more than them.
>
>> If the maintainer of package A or provider of service
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/11/14 03:53 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El sáb, 01-11-2014 a las 14:54 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
>> On 31/10/14 10:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>> Sorry for top posting. I volunteer to write something to get
>>> the logs attached to bu
Hello fellow devs,
Please review the attached qt4-build-multilib.eclass ASAP. It's
basically the current qt4-build.eclass with some old cruft removed and
multilib support added.
Given the amount of changes needed for multilib, we chose to introduce
a separate eclass rather than modifying the exis
On 11/01/2014 03:36 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:52:57PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Michał Górny told me on IRC that I might be approaching this incorrectly (or
>>> at least, inefficiently). I was working on the massive bug-spree (right now
>>> stopped around 22% of th
El sáb, 01-11-2014 a las 14:54 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
> On 31/10/14 10:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> > Sorry for top posting. I volunteer to write something to get the
> > logs attached to bugs. I'll do it next week. Whether it be
> > something the tinderbox can run or something sep
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:52:57PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Michał Górny told me on IRC that I might be approaching this incorrectly (or
> > at least, inefficiently). I was working on the massive bug-spree (right now
> > stopped around 22% of the packages to investigate) so I'm temporarily
>
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> OK, i've cobbled something together that looks like it'll work.
Cool! Thanks a lot for doing that.
//Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 31/10/14 10:37 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> Sorry for top posting. I volunteer to write something to get the
> logs attached to bugs. I'll do it next week. Whether it be
> something the tinderbox can run or something separate that will use
> py
> The newest member of Gentoo can have more power to direct the course
> of the distro than every oldtimer or council member there is, if they
> just contribute more than them.
> If the maintainer of package A or provider of service B is a pain to
> work with, all it takes is for somebody else wh
On 01/11/14 11:47, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
The problem with "it's trivial to do that in python so just do it" is
that first of all Python is not my language of choice, so the whole
infrastructure is currently not written in Python at all. And all the
people, including Luca, who promised they ca
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 11:38 AM, hasufell wrote:
>
> But there will be no improvement if we don't take such issues more
> seriously. I don't really see that happening. It's something the
> oldtimers have more power over than the council.
>
In a community project, the folks with power are those do
On 11/01/2014 01:18 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> What we can't do is force somebody to contribute. If somebody says
> that if we don't do multilib their way, they'll stop being the only
> libreoffice maintainer, and nobody else wants to maintain libreoffice,
> then we are left in a hard place (com
El sáb, 01-11-2014 a las 10:47 +, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
> On 1 November 2014 00:18, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > So, if there is a better way, I'm all ears for constructive
> > suggestions. By constructive I mean that somebody who comes up with a
> > script that automatically retrieves buil
Dnia 2014-11-01, o godz. 12:17:22
Sven Vermeulen napisał(a):
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:26:49PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > With this change, we implement the same end result (correctly labeled
> > > files after installation) while removing the need for the DEPEND
> > > d
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:26:49PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > With this change, we implement the same end result (correctly labeled
> > files after installation) while removing the need for the DEPEND
> > dependency. After all, this was not a build-time dependency but a
> > "merge
On 1 November 2014 10:47, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> But let's reason a moment on the no-linked-logs policy: as Rich
> pointed out already, the policy is there for a reason and that reason
> is that we don't want people to submit bugs with pastebins or home
> server logs because they are bound to
On 1 November 2014 00:18, Rich Freeman wrote:
> So, if there is a better way, I'm all ears for constructive
> suggestions. By constructive I mean that somebody who comes up with a
> script that automatically retrieves build logs and attaches them to
> bugs is being more helpful than somebody who
18 matches
Mail list logo
