Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual: virtual/podofo-build

2014-10-14 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/14/2014 06:42 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 10/14/2014 06:20 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> So, if the podofo-build virtual listed boost in its RDEPENDs that >> would be fine. However, it would seem simpler to me to just list >> boost in the calibre DEPENDs. > > Yeah, boost in the calibre DEPENDs

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual: virtual/podofo-build

2014-10-14 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/14/2014 06:20 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > So, if the podofo-build virtual listed boost in its RDEPENDs that > would be fine. However, it would seem simpler to me to just list > boost in the calibre DEPENDs. Yeah, boost in the calibre DEPENDs satisfies my `emerge --depclean --with-bdeps=n` req

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual: virtual/podofo-build

2014-10-14 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > I feel like there should be a DEPEND specifier for "packages required to > build against this package". For example, xproto is required to build > against SDL (at least using pkg-config), but not to simply use it at > runtime. This applies even if

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenLDAP 2.3.x removal on October 27, migrate to 2.4.x

2014-10-14 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Tuesday 14 October 2014 16:02:20 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:52:03AM +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > On 10/14/14 05:22, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > For compatibility and migration support, we've kept the old OpenLDAP > > > 2.3.x ebuilds in the tree for nearly 5 years.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing a blocker from a stable package

2014-10-14 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 10/14/14 20:25, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 10/13/2014 02:41 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: I agree with Diego and Ralph: Go with d. repoman will generate a warning (not an error) about a dependency which does not exist, but this is safe to ignore. Given that (d) didn't require me to do anything e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing a blocker from a stable package

2014-10-14 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 10/13/2014 02:41 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > I agree with Diego and Ralph: Go with d. > > repoman will generate a warning (not an error) about a dependency > which does not exist, but this is safe to ignore. > Given that (d) didn't require me to do anything else, I just went ahead and remove

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual: virtual/podofo-build

2014-10-14 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/14/2014 03:56 PM, Alex Xu wrote: > On 13/10/14 03:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a >> virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and >> dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put >> virtual/podofo-buil

Re: [gentoo-dev] new virtual: virtual/podofo-build

2014-10-14 Thread Alex Xu
On 13/10/14 03:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > Hi, > > In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a > virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and > dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put > virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and app-text/podofo in RDEPEND. Th

[gentoo-dev] Re: new virtual: virtual/podofo-build

2014-10-14 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/13/2014 12:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > Hi, > > In order to solve bug #503802 [1], I would like to add a > virtual/podofo-build package to pull in app-text/podofo and > dev-libs/boost. Then packages like app-text/calibre can put > virtual/podofo-build in DEPEND and app-text/podofo in RDEPEND.

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenLDAP 2.3.x removal on October 27, migrate to 2.4.x

2014-10-14 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 07:52:03AM +0800, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 10/14/14 05:22, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > For compatibility and migration support, we've kept the old OpenLDAP > > 2.3.x ebuilds in the tree for nearly 5 years. > > And you better keep them for a while, because some of us are s