Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-10-11 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > I would say the following still should be fixed: >... > > These look like some namespace issues, and different use of registers (on > x86). #46 is hardened specific. Do any of these actually apply to non-hardened amd64? I picked

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unifying the PostgreSQL Ebuilds

2014-10-11 Thread Aaron W. Swenson
On 2014-09-19 10:11, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > I've been working on unifying the PostgreSQL ebuilds for a while now. > > Besides just being cleaner and taking a bit less time to compile, it > will inherently resolve a couple issues that are difficult to > workaround, such as cross compilation [1]

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-10-11 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 10/11/14 16:28, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:07 PM, M. Ziebell wrote: But if anyone would ask me to stabilize gcc-4.8 I would say "amd64 ok". If there is general consensus that this is going to be a stable target it might make sense to start running mixed stable+gcc-4.8 sy

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-10-11 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Samstag, 11. Oktober 2014, 22:28:08 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:07 PM, M. Ziebell wrote: > > But if anyone would ask me to stabilize gcc-4.8 I would say "amd64 ok". > > If there is general consensus that this is going to be a stable target > it might make sense to start r

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-10-11 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 4:07 PM, M. Ziebell wrote: > > But if anyone would ask me to stabilize gcc-4.8 I would say "amd64 ok". > If there is general consensus that this is going to be a stable target it might make sense to start running mixed stable+gcc-4.8 systems as widely as possible for feedb

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unify keyring related USE flags

2014-10-11 Thread Alexander Tsoy
В Sat, 11 Oct 2014 17:02:20 +0200 Pacho Ramos пишет: > Hello > > I am wondering about current status of keyring related USE flags: > - gnome-keyring USE is listed as global USE > - libsecret is a local USE > - wallet is local (only used by one package now) Err.. wallet USE flag is completely un

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-10-11 Thread M. Ziebell
I took a look a the list of the current blocker of gcc-4.8 and many / most of them seem to be hardend or x86 related. Right now I'm using an amd64 linux with some freaky "lto + heavily optimized" make.conf flags and didn't find a gcc-4.8 related bug. Except the usual list of package just not ready

[gentoo-dev]

2014-10-11 Thread Paige Thompson
There's a bunch of hype about ubuntu for the power 8 (new power 8 Tyan boards which apparently exist but i cant find them anywhere.) I thought gentoo always had a power fork anyway, not sure what the big deal is. I really wish i could find a board and cpu though. They need to release some for

[gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-perl/Template-Latex

2014-10-11 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
# Andreas K. Huettel (11 Oct 2014) # Outdated and unused; masked for removal in 30 days dev-perl/Template-Latex -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Unify keyring related USE flags

2014-10-11 Thread Pacho Ramos
Hello I am wondering about current status of keyring related USE flags: - gnome-keyring USE is listed as global USE - libsecret is a local USE - wallet is local (only used by one package now) I think we should simply have a "keyring" USE flag to enable what most people will want -> keyring suppor

[gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-10-11 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
In my earlier thread I explored the possibility to stabilize gcc-4.8, and we have that going now in . Meanwhile I just applied a small patch for chromium-38 that allows it to compile with gcc-4

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: virtual/{posix,stage1,2,3} Was: Add bc back to the stage3

2014-10-11 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Steven J. Long wrote: > Not arguing with your use-case. Just wondering why ed and bc are considered > such major burdens, but polkit+systemd+udev+dbug+glib+glibc+godknows are a > minimal base. Nobody is talking about adding most of that stuff to the @system set.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Looking for alternative to RESTRICT=userpriv

2014-10-11 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/11/2014 12:06 AM, Steven J. Long wrote: > On Sun, Oct 05, 2014, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 10/02/2014 07:32 PM, Steven J. Long wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, Zac Medico wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2014, Zac Medico wrote: >> We control the shell code that launches the requested command, so