Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Are users forced to use PAM?

2014-10-05 Thread Lars Wendler
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 03:53:11 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >On 05/10/14 16:20, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: >> Please get upstream to apply the patch and release a new sudo >> version. >> >> Simple as this: -pam is not by default tested and you keep the >> pieces if it breaks. If you can get upstrea

[gentoo-dev] Re: Are users forced to use PAM?

2014-10-05 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 05/10/14 16:20, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Please get upstream to apply the patch and release a new sudo version. Simple as this: -pam is not by default tested and you keep the pieces if it breaks. If you can get upstream to just apply that patch, you solve your problem. Insulting developers a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping GCC maintainership

2014-10-05 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
On 10/05/2014 06:44 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > Hey all, I'm stepping down as GCC maintainer. I haven't been reading > toolchain > bugmail since June, and keep telling myself I'll tackle it next weekend, which > never happens. To be frank, I'm kinda sick of Gentoo. I'm hoping it's > temporary but we

[gentoo-dev] Dropping GCC maintainership

2014-10-05 Thread Ryan Hill
Hey all, I'm stepping down as GCC maintainer. I haven't been reading toolchain bugmail since June, and keep telling myself I'll tackle it next weekend, which never happens. To be frank, I'm kinda sick of Gentoo. I'm hoping it's temporary but we'll see. In the meantime I don't want to be respons

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Looking for alternative to RESTRICT=userpriv

2014-10-05 Thread Zac Medico
On 10/02/2014 07:32 PM, Steven J. Long wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 07:52:02AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 09/29/2014 04:31 PM, Steven J. Long wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014, Zac Medico wrote: On 09/28/2014, Steven J. Long wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014, Zac Medico wrote: >> 1)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are users forced to use PAM?

2014-10-05 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 14:20:49 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Insulting developers as it's happening on that bug will bring you > nowhere. Sadly, the person in question has been on my watch list for a very long time. jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Deprecating and killing herds in metadata.xml

2014-10-05 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 18:30:04 +0200 Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 09:18:55 +0200 > Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > > f...@gentoo.org > > .. > to keep willikins' !meta -v functionality working. You mean we should design our organisational structures around an IRC bot now? jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding dev-lang/perl version to emerge --info

2014-10-05 Thread Panagiotis Christopoulos
On 00:27 Sat 04 Oct , Lars Wendler wrote: > On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 00:05:19 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > ... > >since Perl is a fairly central package and it's hard to debug problems > >without the exact version, the perl team would like to add > >dev-lang/perl to profiles/info_pkgs. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Deprecating and killing herds in metadata.xml

2014-10-05 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 09:18:55 +0200 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > f...@gentoo.org .. to keep willikins' !meta -v functionality working.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-php/{adodb-ext,eaccelerator,pecl-apc,pecl-id3,pecl-mogilefs,pecl-sca_sdo,suhosin}

2014-10-05 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hi Brian, On 02.10.2014 20:29, Brian Evans wrote: > # Brian Evans ( 1 Oct 2014 ) # Masked for > removal in 30 days. # Broken on >=dev-lang/php-5.4. No > replacements known. [..] dev-php/suhosin is that true for suhosin? Upstream reads "has been tested with PHP 5.4 and 5.5" [1] and there i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are users forced to use PAM?

2014-10-05 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Thanks for looking it up Matthias. Sounds like me or someone else will get to it asap (not on my laptop right now to commit). On Oct 5, 2014 4:45 PM, "Matthias Maier" wrote: > > Am 05. Oct 2014, 15:20 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò >: > > > Simple as this: -pam is not by default tested and you keep

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are users forced to use PAM?

2014-10-05 Thread Matthias Maier
Am 05. Oct 2014, 15:20 schrieb Diego Elio Pettenò : > Simple as this: -pam is not by default tested and you keep the pieces if it > breaks. Upstream bug is at [1]. According to comment 1 also upstream does not seem to test non-pam use cases all that often. I have the impression that all this fu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are users forced to use PAM?

2014-10-05 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Please get upstream to apply the patch and release a new sudo version. Simple as this: -pam is not by default tested and you keep the pieces if it breaks. If you can get upstream to just apply that patch, you solve your problem. Insulting developers as it's happening on that bug will bring you now

[gentoo-dev] Re: Are users forced to use PAM?

2014-10-05 Thread Martin Vaeth
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > In bug 524074 (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524074), Joshua > Kinard mentioned that Gentoo cannot support systems where PAM isn't > installed. All my gentoo boxes run without pam from the very beginning (since many years). I hope that it will not be necessary

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are users forced to use PAM?

2014-10-05 Thread Philip Webb
141005 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > In bug 524074 (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524074), > Joshua Kinard mentioned that Gentoo cannot support systems > where PAM isn't installed. I'd like to know whether this is true or not, > especially since no part of the system seems to actually requi

[gentoo-dev] Are users forced to use PAM?

2014-10-05 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
In bug 524074 (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524074), Joshua Kinard mentioned that Gentoo cannot support systems where PAM isn't installed. I'd like to know whether this is true or not, especially since no part of the system seems to actually require it. It is there if you need it. I