Jauhien Piatlicki:
> In the ideal country of elves. In the real life it can be not possible to
> build and install software in a given distribution without downstream
> patches. You can find examples of such live ebuilds in Gentoo tree.
I think it's not appropriate and shouldn't generally be do
Hi,
13.09.14 22:03, Peter Stuge написав(ла):
>> E.g. we in downstream have some patches, when upstream changes
>> related code (e.g. applying our patches), ebuild fails to build.
>
> I consider this a separate issue however. I would actually expect
> there to be a policy which forbids patches on
Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> The question is not about crap in the upstream, but about changed
> dependencies, behavior, whatever else.
That's a good point.
> E.g. we in downstream have some patches, when upstream changes
> related code (e.g. applying our patches), ebuild fails to build.
I conside
13.09.14 19:31, Peter Stuge написав(ла):
> Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
>> Emerging live ebuild usually is quite a risky thing,
>
> I don't know. It depends on the culture of the particular repository,
> and while it is true that many open source repos are utter crap I'm
> not sure if that is the comm
Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> Emerging live ebuild usually is quite a risky thing,
I don't know. It depends on the culture of the particular repository,
and while it is true that many open source repos are utter crap I'm
not sure if that is the common case?
I like to believe that developers actually
Michał Górny wrote:
> ( source "${f}" || die "sourcing ${f} failed" )
>
> 2b. Unless someone knows a way around this, this means that the check
> -- unless 'die'-fatal -- needs to ensure non-zero status of last
> comment, likely via some trailing 'true' or ':'. Since we can't
> distinguish betwe
Dnia 2014-09-13, o godz. 16:03:31
Jauhien Piatlicki napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> 11.09.14 00:20, Michał Górny написав(ла):
> >
> > I would like to have install-qa-check.d in three main places:
> >
> > 1. /usr/lib/portage/install-qa-check.d (or alike) for scripts
> > installed by Portage and other pac
Hi,
11.09.14 00:20, Michał Górny написав(ла):
>
> I would like to have install-qa-check.d in three main places:
>
> 1. /usr/lib/portage/install-qa-check.d (or alike) for scripts
> installed by Portage and other packages,
>
> 2. /etc/portage/install-qa-check.d for extra scripts installed
> by sy
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2014, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2014, Michał Górny wrote:
>> As I see it, we should simply ban einstall in EAPI 6. This way, we
>> can prevent further mistakes from happening and let developers fix
>> the current consumers once bumping EAPI (or lastrite them a
