hasufell wrote:
> On 08/30/2014 02:35 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>> For net-im/skype,
>
> Screw skype.
Please don't. Not all communication partners are linux users.
> We have tox [1] on the way.
This is far from being ready, especially for non-specialists.
It is not even foreseeable whether the
On 08/30/14 17:05, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014, Anthony G Basile wrote:
[...] package management systems (PMS) [...]
Apart from its other more common uses [1,2], "PMS" in a Gentoo context
stands for the "Package Manager Specification" [3] and the project
associated with it [4]. So
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2014, Anthony G Basile wrote:
> [...] package management systems (PMS) [...]
Apart from its other more common uses [1,2], "PMS" in a Gentoo context
stands for the "Package Manager Specification" [3] and the project
associated with it [4]. So please do not use the same abbrevi
Developers,
I believe that we should work towards deprecating and removing
the einstall helper from PMS, for the following reasons:
1. einstall is confusing to new developers and contributors who often
see it as the 'proper' way of installing software -- mostly because of
the name matching econf/
Hi everyone,
I've written a GLEP which outlines a standard for what information
should be stored by any package management systems (PMS) in /var/db/pkg
(VDB) and mandates some API for exporting it to other tools [1]. The
need to do so was discussed in the Council during the 20130910 meeting
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 04:51:35 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 14:35:20
>
> "J. Roeleveld" napisał(a):
> > On Saturday, August 30, 2014 01:46:20 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Right now, we have 1262 packages assigned to maintainer-needed@. Only
> > > a
Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 14:35:20
"J. Roeleveld" napisał(a):
> On Saturday, August 30, 2014 01:46:20 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Right now, we have 1262 packages assigned to maintainer-needed@. Only
> > a few of them have a large number of bugs, many have just version bump
> > requ
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:03:10 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>>On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Michał Górny
>>wrote:
>>> Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 13:27:08
>>> "J. Roeleveld" napisał(a):
Not sure if this idea has been discussed before,
On 08/30/2014 02:35 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> For net-im/skype,
Screw skype. We have tox [1] on the way. Try tox-overlay (not in tree,
because there is no release yet, however it already works relatively well).
[1] https://tox.im
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 08:03:10 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote:
>On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Michał Górny
>wrote:
>> Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 13:27:08
>> "J. Roeleveld" napisał(a):
>>>
>>> Not sure if this idea has been discussed before, but:
>>> Wouldn't it be an idea to have a "virtual/init" which
On 08/30/2014 12:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Right now, we have 1262 packages assigned to maintainer-needed@. Only
> a few of them have a large number of bugs, many have just version bump
> requests. 953 packages have no bug open.
>
> Please consider adopting some of the packages, or
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Please consider adopting some of the packages, or at least fixing some
> of the relevant bugs. For package - bug count list, take a look at [1].
> Please note that this list is not autogenerated, so it will soon be
> outdated, I hope :).
Nice
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 01:46:20 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Right now, we have 1262 packages assigned to maintainer-needed@. Only
> a few of them have a large number of bugs, many have just version bump
> requests. 953 packages have no bug open.
>
> Please consider adopting some of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/30/2014 01:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Right now, we have 1262 packages assigned to maintainer-needed@.
> Only a few of them have a large number of bugs, many have just
> version bump requests. 953 packages have no bug open.
Thank
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 01:41:26 PM Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 13:27:08
>
> "J. Roeleveld" napisał(a):
> > On Friday, August 29, 2014 10:41:51 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 13:27:08
> "J. Roeleveld" napisał(a):
>>
>> Not sure if this idea has been discussed before, but:
>> Wouldn't it be an idea to have a "virtual/init" which depends on 1 of:
>
> You mean our virtual/service-manager?
>
Hello,
Right now, we have 1262 packages assigned to maintainer-needed@. Only
a few of them have a large number of bugs, many have just version bump
requests. 953 packages have no bug open.
Please consider adopting some of the packages, or at least fixing some
of the relevant bugs. For package - b
Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 13:27:08
"J. Roeleveld" napisał(a):
> On Friday, August 29, 2014 10:41:51 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki
> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have a simple question: why do we have systemd subprofiles only in gnome
> > > a
On Friday, August 29, 2014 10:41:51 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki
wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a simple question: why do we have systemd subprofiles only in gnome
> > and kde profiles?
> >
> > Could we add systemd subprofiles also to default/li
Hi,
30.08.14 04:41, Rich Freeman написав(ла):
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a simple question: why do we have systemd subprofiles only in gnome
>> and kde profiles?
>>
>> Could we add systemd subprofiles also to default/linux/$arch/13.0/ and
20 matches
Mail list logo
