[Mailed direct and to list.]
Tyler Pohl posted on Mon, 11 Aug 2014 21:20:17 -0700 as excerpted:
> how to i get off these mailing lists?
Follow the instructions, as found in the headers of every mail on the
list including the one you replied to, or the ones on the site you
presumably signed up
On 10 August 2014 18:51, Georg Rudoy <0xd34df...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking of converting a few ebuilds (x11-libs/qwt,
> dev-libs/kqoauth, net-libs/qxmpp among them) to support building with
> both Qt4 and Qt5.
>
> Should this better be done by adding the corresponding useflags (qt4
>
how to i get off these mailing lists?
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:42 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:59:30AM +0200, Manuel Rüger wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
>
> *snip*
>
> > These links might be helpful:
> >
> >
> http://git.overlays.gento
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:59:30AM +0200, Manuel Rüger wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
*snip*
> These links might be helpful:
>
> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=06637c4215d55c57517739214c6e0fd6f8f53914
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/12/2014 03:48 AM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 03:22:11PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich
> wrote:
>> Hello World!
>>
>> TL;DR: This evening I plan to mangle ~3000 ebuilds in the main
>> tree by dropping trailing '.' in all 'DESCRI
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 03:22:11PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> Hello World!
>
> TL;DR:
> This evening I plan to mangle ~3000 ebuilds in the main tree
> by dropping trailing '.' in all 'DESCRIPTION=' fields (except "etc." case)
>
> Long story:
>
> As you may know newest portage release
Am Sonntag, 10. August 2014, 14:51:45 schrieb Georg Rudoy:
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking of converting a few ebuilds (x11-libs/qwt,
> dev-libs/kqoauth, net-libs/qxmpp among them) to support building with
> both Qt4 and Qt5.
>
> Should this better be done by adding the corresponding useflags (qt4
> and q
Hi,
I'm thinking of converting a few ebuilds (x11-libs/qwt,
dev-libs/kqoauth, net-libs/qxmpp among them) to support building with
both Qt4 and Qt5.
Should this better be done by adding the corresponding useflags (qt4
and qt5 respectively) or by slotting? The pros and cons for each, off
the top of
Hi,
On 2014-08-10 14:22, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
The script does not handle case of multiline description:
DESCRIPTION="You have to
clean that yourself."
You could handle this by reading metadata/md5-cache/*/* instead of
ebuild itself
But is multiline DESCRIPTION something recomm
On 09/08/14 21:22, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> A better bug reporting client will not deal with all the problems of bad
> reports (and probably exacerbate that problem), but it will stop spam
> and should encourage users to file more bug reports, and would be
> based on a vetted implementation that has
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2014-08-10 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-vcs/gitosis 2014-08-04 04:35:46 robbat2
dev-vcs/gitosis-gentoo 2014-08-04 04:35:46 robbat2
Additions:
net-libs/txtorcon 2014-08-04 2
# Tiziano Müller (10 Aug 2014)
# Bundles an old (2.0.0) and vulnerable, but modified version of expat.
# Testsuite is completely broken and upstream seems to be working on the
# next rewrite instead of fixing this one. Nothing in the tree depends on it.
# Removal in a month.
dev-python/amara
Hello World!
TL;DR:
This evening I plan to mangle ~3000 ebuilds in the main tree
by dropping trailing '.' in all 'DESCRIPTION=' fields (except "etc." case)
Long story:
As you may know newest portage release 2.2.11
got a minor (but chatty) QA warning:
DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character
Hi,
On 09/08/14 18:18, Igor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hereby the summary of my personal suggestions to increase GENTOO stability
> and help it's maintainers
> and developers.
>
> 1. make.conf
>
>Add
>
>BUG_REPORT_URL "http://";(or similar name)
>BUG_REPORT ON/OFF
>BUG_REPORT_LE
Hello Kent,
Saturday, August 9, 2014, 11:49:43 PM, you wrote:
We have a lot of uncertainty even about what to send and how. It is
important for a data processor to understand what data is going to be fed
before it's designed.
If you have 1000 requests/second JSON parsing might be a problem and
Hello Tim,
Sunday, August 10, 2014, 4:41:09 AM, you wrote:
I have no doubts that it could be done.
What I'm perplexed about...
The project consists of 3 major parts:
Reporting (portage -> Database <- Processing)
Database
Processing
Wouldn't it be logical to have Data Reporting unit work
16 matches
Mail list logo
