On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Wulf C. Krueger
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 16.07.2014 18:06, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >> IANAL, but there is no such concept as "abandonware" in copyright
> >> law.
> [...]
> > This is legally a very risky thing to do. If you're
Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML...
> On Jul 16, 2014, at 7:24 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:53:25 +0200
> Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Denis Dupeyron
>> wrote:
>>> The only position you don't want vapier in is behind you. He hump
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:53:25 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Denis Dupeyron
> wrote:
> > The only position you don't want vapier in is behind you. He humps.
>
> This seems rather wildly inappropriate. WTF?
It's an injoke. Next thing you know people start stabbin
Denis Dupeyron:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:11 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> a) I'm not sure if I want to be in a team where vapier is lead.
>
> The only position you don't want vapier in is behind you. He humps.
>
I have no idea what to respond to that, except that you seem to ignore
the actual fact
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/07/14 03:54 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Denis Dupeyron
> wrote:
>>
>> Let me try and be clearer. The packages I'm concerned with have
>> had their distfiles backed up. We're not yet in that situation
>> but the
Dirkjan Ochtman posted on Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:53:25 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 wrote:
>> The only position you don't want vapier in is behind you. He humps.
>
> This seems rather wildly inappropriate. WTF?
FWIW, it's apparently an inside joke going back many years, possibly to
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
>
> Let me try and be clearer. The packages I'm concerned with have had
> their distfiles backed up. We're not yet in that situation but the day
> the publisher stops distributing these distfiles, I'll be ready to
> send the right email to the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> So, RESTRICT="mirror" would turn into
> RESTRICT="officially-dont-mirror-but-actually-do-just-in-case-distfiles-are-dropped-upstream-but-after-we-still-cant-officially-mirror-them-due-to-license-and-copyright-infringement-anyway"
> ?
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/07/14 03:19 PM, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Alexander Berntsen
> wrote:
>> Ulrich is right. Abandonware just means orphaned works -- i.e.
>> the copyright holder hasn't sued anyone yet. Gentoo should not
>> have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 16/07/14 21:19, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> I agree with you and Ulrich. That was a very poor choice of word
> from my part and not what I wanted to say. I didn't mean we should
> distribute distfiles without consent, but back them up to a hidden
>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Alexander Berntsen
wrote:
> Ulrich is right. Abandonware just means orphaned works -- i.e. the
> copyright holder hasn't sued anyone yet. Gentoo should not have
> anything to do with this.
I agree with you and Ulrich. That was a very poor choice of word from
my p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ulrich is right. Abandonware just means orphaned works -- i.e. the
copyright holder hasn't sued anyone yet. Gentoo should not have
anything to do with this.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16.07.2014 18:06, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> IANAL, but there is no such concept as "abandonware" in copyright
>> law.
[...]
> This is legally a very risky thing to do. If you're going to do
> it you want to take advantage of countries with friendly la
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> IANAL, but there is no such concept as "abandonware" in copyright law.
> Copyright can expire, at which point the work enters into the public
> domain. However, the time for that is generally too long to play any
> practical role for softwa
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> The only position you don't want vapier in is behind you. He humps.
This seems rather wildly inappropriate. WTF?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
> I have once asked Robin to archive the distfiles for a commercial
> package which has RESTRICT=mirror. My reasoning at the time was that
> if upstream disappears there's a good chance, depending on why that
> happens, we can qualify the software a
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:10 PM, hasufell wrote:
> People often reply aggressively to unrequested reviews
People often replay aggressively when they feel aggressed. Food for thought?
Denis.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:11 PM, hasufell wrote:
> a) I'm not sure if I want to be in a team where vapier is lead.
The only position you don't want vapier in is behind you. He humps.
Denis.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> Last rites cancelled; found a version bump'ed distfile via icculus, so
> this one can live a little longer.
I have once asked Robin to archive the distfiles for a commercial
package which has RESTRICT=mirror. My reasoning at the time was t
Matthew Summers posted on Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:18:23 -0500 as excerpted:
> So, libressl is really nowhere near ready for prime time or even late
> night TV (perhaps the day time talk shows, but that is a stretch given
> the PRNG situation). I think preparing a virtual and updating dependent
> ebuil
20 matches
Mail list logo
