Re: [gentoo-dev] Multilib project newsletter #n

2014-07-01 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/07/14 01:24 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Tue, 01 Jul 2014, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >> On 01/07/14 06:44 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: || ( amd64? ( >>> >>> I thought we were trying to discourage that abomination... > >> It's still

Re: [gentoo-dev] Multilib project newsletter #n

2014-07-01 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Tue, 01 Jul 2014, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 01/07/14 06:44 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >>> || ( amd64? ( >> >> I thought we were trying to discourage that abomination... > It's still necessary, unfortunately, until such time as everything > in the tree no longer needs/depends on the e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Multilib project newsletter #n

2014-07-01 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/07/14 06:44 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 00:38:53 +0200 Michał Górny > wrote: >> || ( amd64? ( > > I thought we were trying to discourage that abomination... > It's still necessary, unfortunately, until such time as every

Re: [gentoo-dev] Multilib project newsletter #n

2014-07-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 00:38:53 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > || ( > amd64? ( I thought we were trying to discourage that abomination... -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Multilib project newsletter #n

2014-07-01 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, developers and users. I'm pretty sure that all of you are waiting with bated breaths for news on the multilib project, so I've scrambled this quick newsletter listing our latest achievements, issues and other things you may want to know. In random order: 1. hasufell fixed the header wrapp

Re: [gentoo-dev] cvs.gentoo.org, git.gentoo.org, *.overlays.gentoo.org migration timeline & ssh keys

2014-07-01 Thread James Cloos
A quick test shows that the sshfp for the ed25519 key for the current host is not published; those who configure ssh to prefer ssh-ed25519 and VerifyHostKeyDNS will get an error about that, even after accepting the key, just because the other keys' sshfps are published. Please be sure to publish s

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: =dev-lang/perl-5.12* and family

2014-07-01 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/07/14 07:57 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > perl-core/Switch is now stabilized on "amd64 ppc x86", so this > should be fixed. > >> On 30/06/14 04:46 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: >>> [snip!] * As Fabian pointed out, perl-core/Switch-2.160.0

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: =dev-lang/perl-5.12* and family

2014-07-01 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 30/06/14 18:16, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 30/06/14 04:46 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > [snip!] * As Fabian pointed out, perl-core/Switch-2.160.0 should > > still go stable. Fine with me (but I can't read your minds about > > future stabilizations, and the virtual only had ~arch reverse

Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask vs ~arch

2014-07-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 06/30/14 22:15, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:25:27 -0400 >> Rich Freeman wrote: >> >>> Agree 100%. I'm taking about masking things that HAVEN'T BEEN TESTED >>> AT ALL. The maintainer knows that they compile, and that i

Re: [gentoo-dev] package.mask vs ~arch

2014-07-01 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 06/30/14 22:15, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:25:27 -0400 > Rich Freeman wrote: > >> Agree 100%. I'm taking about masking things that HAVEN'T BEEN TESTED >> AT ALL. The maintainer knows that they compile, and that is it. > > Developers who "HAVEN'T [...] TESTED AT ALL" and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Docker 1.0.0 masked for no known reason?

2014-07-01 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 06/29/14 17:33, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 06/29/2014 10:23 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: >> On Sunday 29 June 2014 17:03:52 Patrick Lauer wrote: >>> On Sunday 29 June 2014 10:12:22 Tom Wijsman wrote: On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 09:09:36 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote: > It's been a long ti

Re: Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: =dev-lang/perl-5.12* and family

2014-07-01 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> > It would be nice if something like a pkgmove be done on the virtual, > > though, upon its elimintation; anyone that installed the virtual to > > obtain perl Switch shouldn't have to unmerge and specifically emerge > > perl-core/Switch. I'm not sure if pkgmove itself supports this, though.. >

Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: =dev-lang/perl-5.12* and family

2014-07-01 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
perl-core/Switch is now stabilized on "amd64 ppc x86", so this should be fixed. > On 30/06/14 04:46 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > [snip!] * As Fabian pointed out, perl-core/Switch-2.160.0 should > > still go stable. Fine with me (but I can't read your minds about > > future stabilizations, a

Re: [gentoo-dev] parser/generator for /etc/conf.d/net*

2014-07-01 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:46:38 -0700 C.J. Adams-Collier KF7BMP wrote: > Hello folks, > > I've got a project on my plate to automate and reduce the human error in > adding new VLANs, subnets, addresses, etc. to our production firewall > fleet. Today, we manually make modifications to the following o