William Hubbs posted on Mon, 09 Jun 2014 22:14:34 -0500 as excerpted:
> Daniel Robbins assisted me today with tweaking the bios of the box I
> plan to put Gentoo on so that I can boot it from a cdrom. Also he
> alerted me to this thread, so that is why I wanted to post this update.
>
> He will al
All,
I attempted to post an update a bit earlier, but I haven't seen it yet,
so I thought I would try again.
Thanks to Daniel Robbins of funtoo, I am about to getGentoo installed on
another box, so I will be able to take the lead on OpenRC again. He
assisted me on Skype today with getting in
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 04:31:27 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:16:02 -0600
> Ryan Hill wrote:
>
> > Beginning with GCC 4.8.3, Stack Smashing Protection (SSP) will be
> > enabled by default.[..]
>
> .. on supported architectures.
>
>
> Right?
Yes. But now you've got me wor
All,
just a quick update.
I now have a box set up for installing gentoo on it so I will be able to
take the lead on OpenRC again.
I will have that up and running, probably tomorrow, then I also have a
medical situation I have to take care of in a couple of weeks.
I will continue to be inte
Alexey Shvetsov writes:
> However this will depend on migration of gentoo-x86 to git
Well, we can start evaluating gitlab for git overlays and gentoo hosted
projects, such as (back to topic :) OpenRC.
Is the infra team interested in this option?
pgpqPDX0LzcUz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 18:16:02 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> Beginning with GCC 4.8.3, Stack Smashing Protection (SSP) will be
> enabled by default.[..]
.. on supported architectures.
Right?
jer
Alexander Berntsen writes:
> It would be cool if some of the OpenRC hackers had the time to set up
> a developer's wiki or similar, where they share their workflow and
> similar.
Nice idea, on my list.
pgp5kJikw7nfi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Title: GCC 4.8.3 defaults to -fstack-protector
Author: Ryan Hill
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2014-06-10
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: >=sys-devel/gcc-4.8.3
Beginning with GCC 4.8.3, Stack Smashing Protection (SSP) will be
enabled by default. The 4.8 series will ena
On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:45:26 +
hasufell wrote:
> Probably because no one mentored them on how to fix these QA issues.
> Otherwise... if that's attitude, then that's just sad and has to be
> fixed by those who run that overlay (review, contribution guidelines).
>
> And I still think that the
Thomas Kahle:
> then they stay in the overlay
> because people feel it is not worth the effort to fix the QA
> issues which in turn would be necessary before moving them to the
> main tree.
>
Probably because no one mentored them on how to fix these QA issues.
Otherwise... if that's attitude, the
Hello,
For some time I've been working on bringing multilib gstreamer
into the tree. Following recent review by gstreamer team, I would like
to submit the new eclass for a wider opinion.
The gstreamer.eclass intends to replace all of gst-plugins* eclasses.
It provides routines suitable for buildi
On 08/06/14 18:06, hasufell wrote:
> I am not sure if that is a joke. You can pretty much ask most major
> gentoo projects. The ones where I was involved more deeply definitely
> suffer from that problem, including sunrise and games team. Science team
> gave up importing major ebuilds to the tree a
09.06.2014 21:47, Jeroen Roovers пишет:
> On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:34:06 +0400
> Mikle Kolyada wrote:
>
>>> app-admin/389-admin-console
>>> app-admin/389-console
>>> app-admin/389-ds-console
>>> app-admin/aws-as-tools
>>> app-admin/aws-elb-tools
>>> app-admin/aws-iam-tools
>>> app-admin/aws-rds-too
On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:34:06 +0400
Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> > app-admin/389-admin-console
> > app-admin/389-console
> > app-admin/389-ds-console
> > app-admin/aws-as-tools
> > app-admin/aws-elb-tools
> > app-admin/aws-iam-tools
> > app-admin/aws-rds-tools
> > app-emulation/edumips64
> > dev-java/id
08.06.2014 16:25, Fabio Erculiani пишет:
> Due to permanent lack of time, I'm unable to properly maintain the
> packages below.
> Feel free to take them over. I'll remove myself from metadata.xml in 14 days.
>
> app-admin/389-admin-console
> app-admin/389-console
> app-admin/389-ds-console
> app-a
Rich Freeman writes:
> Uh, you can't force anybody to do anything, and most of them are no
> longer around. You can always encourage or ask nicely.
Yes, I meant that: forcing by asking nicely. :-)
> You can also set a policy of no further commits accepted without
> accompanying documentation,
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:57 AM, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
>
> We should focus on forcing people who were involved into OpenRC to
> document what they know.
Uh, you can't force anybody to do anything, and most of them are no
longer around. You can always encourage or ask nicely. You can also
set
Michael Palimaka writes:
> Perhaps we could consider GitLab?
+1 on that. I have deployed it recently at work and it seems to perform
well. *Really* easy to use. Easy to deploy as well. It's written in
Ruby, *not Java*. It's possible to have a basic integartion with
external issue trackers.
18 matches
Mail list logo
