On Tue, 27 May 2014 10:09:45 -0400
Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> I don't know how much chromium is built and tested on lesser-used
> arches (ie: arm, hppa, ia64, etc)
No version of webkit/blink is known to work on HPPA, particularly
because the JS engine is broken on systems where the stack grows up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/05/14 04:05 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2014 09:02:37 +0200 ""Paweł Hajdan, Jr.""
> wrote:
>
>> I'm seriously considering just removing src_test to make the
>> package more maintainable (less code, less bugs filed, can focus
>> on
Michał Górny писал 27-05-2014 09:34:
Dnia 2014-05-26, o godz. 23:15:34
Samuli Suominen napisał(a):
UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release
(currently unkeyworded in tree), as in, from current git master.
Don't worry. Looking at the past, I can guess this is only
On Tue, 27 May 2014 09:02:37 +0200
""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" wrote:
> I'm seriously considering just removing src_test to make the package
> more maintainable (less code, less bugs filed, can focus on things
> that *do* impact our users).
>
> If you decide to comment in favor of keeping src_test, pl
It's more of a project-internal decision IMHO, but just wanted to get
feedback from the larger community.
Currently 11 out of 27 bugs assigned to chromium.g.o are related to test
failures.
I don't remember a single case where a test failure would point to a
real bug in our package.
I'm seriously
