[gentoo-dev] RFC: Prefix compatibility for gx86's sys-apps/util-linux

2014-05-24 Thread Greg Turner
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=511414. -gmt PS: I sent this once before from the wrong e-mail address -- I'm pretty sure the list will therefore silently drop it. But if I'm wrong, sorry for the dup.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous repoman using travis-ci

2014-05-24 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sat, 24 May 2014 14:03:19 + hasufell wrote: > Nice. > > Any way to fix these annoying dependency.bad warnings about hardened > and no-multilib profiles? It will always show repoman as "failing". Same way as in the Portage tree; the overlay maintainers need to change the visibility accord

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages masked for removal in 30 days

2014-05-24 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sat, 24 May 2014 22:07:26 +0700 (NOVT) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > On Fri, 23 May 2014, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > > s/worthy of/required to cc/ > > Additionally, why mask and remove instead of just doing a pkgmove? > I've sent this to gentoo-dev-annou...@lists.gentoo.org, but it never >

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages masked for removal in 30 days

2014-05-24 Thread grozin
On Fri, 23 May 2014, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: s/worthy of/required to cc/ Additionally, why mask and remove instead of just doing a pkgmove? I've sent this to gentoo-dev-annou...@lists.gentoo.org, but it never appeared. I'm subscribed to gentoo-dev-announce; don't know what's the matter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous repoman using travis-ci

2014-05-24 Thread hasufell
Manuel RĂ¼ger: > Hello, > > I created a travis script (it's rather a hack and could need some > improvements) [1] to run repoman for overlays hosted on github. > > This might be interesting for your personal and also project overlays. > It will run repoman on pull requests, too. > > If you want t

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-05-24 Thread Pacho Ramos
Due weaver lack of the time following packages are not looking for a new maintainer: net-libs/libs3 sys-power/powerman