Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of the as-is (so-called) license

2014-05-19 Thread hasufell
Ulrich Mueller: > > Please fix your overlays if you haven't done so yet. > Thanks for the heads up.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update to elisp-common.eclass

2014-05-19 Thread Alex Xu
On 19/05/14 07:17 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Mon, 19 May 2014, Alex Xu wrote: > >> On 18/05/14 02:13 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> if [[ ${EBUILD_PHASE} = *rm && ! -e ${sitelisp}/site-gentoo.el ]]; then >>> ewarn "Refusing to create site-gentoo.el in ${EBUILD_PHASE} phase." >>> return 0 >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update to elisp-common.eclass

2014-05-19 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 19 May 2014, Alex Xu wrote: > On 18/05/14 02:13 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> if [[ ${EBUILD_PHASE} = *rm && ! -e ${sitelisp}/site-gentoo.el ]]; then >> ewarn "Refusing to create site-gentoo.el in ${EBUILD_PHASE} phase." >> return 0 >> fi >> >> +[[ -d ${sitelisp} ]] \ >> +

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update to elisp-common.eclass

2014-05-19 Thread Alex Xu
On 18/05/14 02:13 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > if [[ ${EBUILD_PHASE} = *rm && ! -e ${sitelisp}/site-gentoo.el ]]; then > ewarn "Refusing to create site-gentoo.el in ${EBUILD_PHASE} > phase." > return 0 > fi > > + [[ -d ${sitelisp} ]] \ > + |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of the as-is (so-called) license

2014-05-19 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 19/05/14 10:57, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > For almost all packages that had previously used "as-is", the > LICENSE variable has been updated now. We are down from some 700 > packages in mid-2012 to only 2 packages today (and course of action > is cle

[gentoo-dev] Removal of the as-is (so-called) license

2014-05-19 Thread Ulrich Mueller
For almost all packages that had previously used "as-is", the LICENSE variable has been updated now. We are down from some 700 packages in mid-2012 to only 2 packages today (and course of action is clear for these remaining ones). See bug 436214 for details. So, as soon as the remaining packages a