On 30/03/14 23:45, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
>
> Your input will be considered here with all the weight it deserves. My
> mask was to force this discussion on the list and it has done it's job
> well.
So, you admit breaking the policy of gentoo-dev being a optional ML
for developers[1]
I
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2014-03-30 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-misc/flyte-download-manager 2014-03-24 07:09:00 moult
virtual/monodoc 2014-03-24 07:15:07 moult
dev-libs/jrtplib2014
hasufell posted on Sat, 29 Mar 2014 22:31:46 + as excerpted:
>> At least an einfo should be added to the package IMO telling the user
>> that HPN is enabled by default.
>>
>>
> No, that's not the right approach. There are tools you can use to check
> what flags are enabled. Use 'eix' and 'eq
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/29/2014 12:13 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> You broke the gentoo-x86 by masking these virtuals without the already
> converted reverse
> dependencies.
No, I didn't, before accusing people of breaking the tree you may want
to cvs up.
> Plus I told
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Steven J. Long wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > Steven J. Long wrote:
> > > > The cross tools should NOT pollute the default PATH, simply because the
> > > > user happened to run crossdev at some point.
> > >
> > > that's bs. people install crossdev to get a cross-co
On 3/26/14, 2:32 PM, Michal Hrusecky wrote:
> Conclusion, in short, is to prefix system users (with some exceptions like
> root
> or nobody) with underscore '_'. So you would get users like '_pop', '_vdr',
> '_tor' or '_znc'. OpenBSD already does that[3]. openSUSE proposal with more
> details can
