On 29/03/14 22:27, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> El 29/03/14 05:13, Samuli Suominen escribió:
>> I took the liberty to unbreak the tree for you. Don't ever touch my
>> packages again unless
>> they are broken.
> Udev is broken:
> * They have known off by one string han
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Toralf Förster:
> On 03/29/2014 08:12 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:15:14 -0400 Alex Xu
>> wrote:
>
>>> On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
https://bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/29/2014 08:12 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:15:14 -0400 Alex Xu
> wrote:
>
>> On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
>>> WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.c
Dnia 2014-03-28, o godz. 02:33:09
Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
> the pango stuff is also broken because it uses /etc/pango/$CHOST in an
> attempt
> to get an ABI unique path. we probably should change that to /etc/pango/$ABI
> or /etc/pango/$(get_libdir) or move it the multilib dir like the gdk
Hi!
El 29/03/14 05:13, Samuli Suominen escribió:
> I took the liberty to unbreak the tree for you. Don't ever touch my
> packages again unless
> they are broken.
Udev is broken:
* They have known off by one string handling errors on their libraries,
the developers were warned of that but have chos
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 07:15:14 -0400
Alex Xu wrote:
> On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> > WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504616#c6 to this list
> > again :
> >
> > "Since the Debian debakel with "fixing" an uni
On 03/29/2014 09:33 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 29/03/14 15:24, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 03/29/2014 09:23 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 03/29/2014 08:58 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 29/03/14 14:30, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 03/28/2014 07:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2
On 29/03/14 15:24, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 03/29/2014 09:23 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> On 03/29/2014 08:58 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> On 29/03/14 14:30, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 03/28/2014 07:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos"
On 03/29/2014 09:23 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 03/29/2014 08:58 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 29/03/14 14:30, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 03/28/2014 07:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
wrote:
All in all, this isn't a bad idea on the su
On 03/29/2014 08:58 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 29/03/14 14:30, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 03/28/2014 07:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
wrote:
All in all, this isn't a bad idea on the surface, but the first
arguement shows immediately w
On 29/03/14 14:30, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> On 03/28/2014 07:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
>> wrote:
>>> All in all, this isn't a bad idea on the surface, but the first
>>> arguement shows immediately when this is scaled up. How many ot
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> I have already suggested separate category for perl virtuals but been
> quieted down at the time. I doubt people really want another category
> for virtuals since some of their poor tools rely on 'virtual/'.
So, first the obvious - the "poor
On 03/28/2014 07:53 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
wrote:
All in all, this isn't a bad idea on the surface, but the first
arguement shows immediately when this is scaled up. How many other
packages have multiple libs with different sonames? Of
On 29/03/14 06:07 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504616#c6 to this list again :
>
> "Since the Debian debakel with "fixing" an uninitialized memeory I'm
> very skeptical to distribution specif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
WRT to but 504616 I'd like to address my questions made in
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=504616#c6 to this list again :
"Since the Debian debakel with "fixing" an uninitialized memeory I'm
very skeptical to distribution specific
Dnia 2014-03-28, o godz. 19:53:07
Rich Freeman napisał(a):
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
> wrote:
> > All in all, this isn't a bad idea on the surface, but the first
> > arguement shows immediately when this is scaled up. How many other
> > packages have multiple l
16 matches
Mail list logo
