On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:30 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> for bug 373219 [1], we are working on providing a functions.sh that does
> not rely on OpenRc so that people who are not using OpenRc can
> completely remove it from their systems.
>
> I can now report that gentoo-functions has been
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2014-03-16 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
x11-misc/slimlock 2014-03-10 10:20:13 titanofold
dev-libs/ido2014-03-15 14:00:04 ssuominen
dev-ruby/ruby-bdb
Hi all,
as a consequence of the full profile tree going EAPI=5 (as announced earlier),
1) the long-deprecated 10.0 profiles make no sense anymore and have been
removed
2) the separate eapi-5-files directory makes no sense anymore.
I've increased the EAPI in profiles/base to 5, and added stabl
Hello.
We are willing to unmask perl-5.18.2 in a couple of days. It seems that
most fatal issues are fixed now, and we, perl herd, are using perl 5.18
in daily life for quite a some time. So if there is no objections, we
will unmask it soon. As usual, if you find any issues, please file a bug
abou
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 11:55:45 -0700
Raymond Jennings wrote:
> If I may ask, isn't usage by 27 packages ample grounds on its own to
> make it a global use flag?
>
> This is one of the questions I noticed on the ebuild quiz, and there
> the ballpark is around 5 packages sharing a use flag. we're w
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
wrote:
> is there any legitimate reason for
> wanting crossdev's i686 wrappers when on a multilib amd64 profile?
>
One other note: legitimacy is in the eye of the legitimizer, I suppose, but
there are sometimes practical reasons to want a no-m
Just a few practical notes on this...
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
wrote:
> > Now, SYSROOT is chosen from multiple conditions. When emerging a
> > package, that happens to be "/" and thus results in:
> > "//usr/lib/pkgconfig://usr/share/pkgconfig"
>
Bleh. This is wher
