Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling /dev/rfkill, testers wanted

2014-03-07 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 08/03/14 00:50, Alexander Tsoy wrote: > В Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:17:20 +0200 > Samuli Suominen пишет: > >> - sys-apps/systemd has it's own service to handle /dev/rfkill from >> 99-systemd.rules we don't install with sys-fs/udev: >> >> SUBSYSTEM=="rfkill", TAG+="systemd", IMPORT{builtin}="path_id"

[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Removal of Ruby MRI 1.8; Ruby MRI 1.9 and 2.0 now default

2014-03-07 Thread Duncan
Ulrich Mueller posted on Fri, 07 Mar 2014 19:07:18 +0100 as excerpted: >> On Fri, 07 Mar 2014, Manuel Rüger wrote: > >> Title: Removal of Ruby MRI 1.8; Ruby MRI 1.9 and 2.0 now default > > Too long, 44 chars maximum by GLEP 42. > > Ulrich Hmm... 0 1 2 3 4 0

[gentoo-dev] Re: Enabling EAPI 5 in arch profile directories

2014-03-07 Thread Steven J. Long
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 09:53:57PM -0500, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > On 12/31/2013 06:43 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 31. Dezember 2013, 23:30:14 schrieb Mike Gilbert: > >> I have noticed that the arch profile directories (profiles/arch/$ARCH) > >> are not EAPI 5 capable. T

[gentoo-dev] Re: Handling /dev/rfkill, testers wanted

2014-03-07 Thread Steven J. Long
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 09:17:20PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: > - sys-apps/systemd has it's own service to handle /dev/rfkill from > 99-systemd.rules we don't install with sys-fs/udev: > > SUBSYSTEM=="rfkill", TAG+="systemd", IMPORT{builtin}="path_id", > ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}+="systemd-rfkill@$nam

Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling /dev/rfkill, testers wanted

2014-03-07 Thread Alexander Tsoy
В Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:17:20 +0200 Samuli Suominen пишет: > - sys-apps/systemd has it's own service to handle /dev/rfkill from > 99-systemd.rules we don't install with sys-fs/udev: > > SUBSYSTEM=="rfkill", TAG+="systemd", IMPORT{builtin}="path_id", > ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}+="systemd-rfkill@$name.serv

Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling /dev/rfkill, testers wanted

2014-03-07 Thread Alexander Tsoy
В Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:15:40 +0200 Samuli Suominen пишет: > > On 07/03/14 21:57, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > > So, make sure only 50-udev-default.rules has it's rfkill line and > > create file 70-gentoo-acl.rules with content of: > > > > SUBSYSTEM=="rfkill", TAG+="udev-acl" > > > > T

Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd's EnvironmentFile

2014-03-07 Thread Pacho Ramos
El vie, 07-03-2014 a las 22:12 +0100, Thomas Kahle escribió: > Hi, > > What's the best practice (if any) for the EnvironmentFile key in > systemd unit files? > > A grep suggests that something under /etc/conf.d/ is popular, but > shouldn't this be reserved for OpenRC exclusively? > > Note that s

[gentoo-dev] systemd's EnvironmentFile

2014-03-07 Thread Thomas Kahle
Hi, What's the best practice (if any) for the EnvironmentFile key in systemd unit files? A grep suggests that something under /etc/conf.d/ is popular, but shouldn't this be reserved for OpenRC exclusively? Note that some packages in the tree are even moving from other locations to /etc/conf.d/,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling /dev/rfkill, testers wanted

2014-03-07 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/03/14 21:57, Samuli Suominen wrote: > [ ... ] > > So, make sure only 50-udev-default.rules has it's rfkill line and create > file 70-gentoo-acl.rules with content of: > > SUBSYSTEM=="rfkill", TAG+="udev-acl" > > This would make it work with ACLs "+" if user is viewed as 'active = TRUE' in >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling /dev/rfkill, testers wanted

2014-03-07 Thread Samuli Suominen
[ ... ] So, make sure only 50-udev-default.rules has it's rfkill line and create file 70-gentoo-acl.rules with content of: SUBSYSTEM=="rfkill", TAG+="udev-acl" This would make it work with ACLs "+" if user is viewed as 'active = TRUE' in `ck-list-sessions` Can someone confirm?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling /dev/rfkill, testers wanted

2014-03-07 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 07/03/14 21:39, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 07/03/14 02:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > > - sys-fs/udev leaves it to root:root as: > > > KERNEL=="rfkill", MODE="0664" > > > - third party packages like mate-bluetooth, gnome-bluetooth install > > both their own udev .rules to adjust /dev/rfkill

Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling /dev/rfkill, testers wanted

2014-03-07 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/03/14 02:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > - sys-fs/udev leaves it to root:root as: > > KERNEL=="rfkill", MODE="0664" > > - third party packages like mate-bluetooth, gnome-bluetooth install > both their own udev .rules to adjust /dev/rfkill to

[gentoo-dev] Handling /dev/rfkill, testers wanted

2014-03-07 Thread Samuli Suominen
- sys-apps/systemd has it's own service to handle /dev/rfkill from 99-systemd.rules we don't install with sys-fs/udev: SUBSYSTEM=="rfkill", TAG+="systemd", IMPORT{builtin}="path_id", ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}+="systemd-rfkill@$name.service" - so this is about sys-fs/udev (and perhaps, sys-auth/consoleki

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: Removal of Ruby MRI 1.8; Ruby MRI 1.9 and 2.0 now default

2014-03-07 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2014, Manuel Rüger wrote: > Title: Removal of Ruby MRI 1.8; Ruby MRI 1.9 and 2.0 now default Too long, 44 chars maximum by GLEP 42. Ulrich pgpivnKSkpYZB.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] News item: Removal of Ruby MRI 1.8; Ruby MRI 1.9 and 2.0 now default

2014-03-07 Thread Manuel Rüger
As we will remove Ruby 1.8 from tree and add Ruby 2.0 target to base profile's RUBY_TARGETS variable, this will be the news item for the upcoming changes. Cheers, Manuel Title: Removal of Ruby MRI 1.8; Ruby MRI 1.9 and 2.0 now default Author: Manuel Rüger Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2014-03