[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-emacs/view-process

2014-02-17 Thread Ulrich Mueller
# Ulrich Müller (18 Feb 2014) # Last upstream release in 1996. # Doesn't appear to work with Emacs 24. # Masked for removal in 30 days, bug 501660. app-emacs/view-process pgplxvchfZQKI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Assigning keyword/stable bugs to arch teams (WAS: [gentoo-dev] dropping redundant stable keywords)

2014-02-17 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:47:42 +0100 Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:46:43 +0100 > Tom Wijsman wrote: > > > It allows undermanned arch teams to prioritize > > Oh, so you're still assuming an understaffed team somehow manages > to do some work in an appropriate time frame. It's get

Re: Assigning keyword/stable bugs to arch teams (WAS: [gentoo-dev] dropping redundant stable keywords)

2014-02-17 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:46:43 +0100 Tom Wijsman wrote: > It allows undermanned arch teams to prioritize Oh, so you're still assuming an understaffed team somehow manages to do some work in an appropriate time frame. It's getting old. Apparently "understaffed" isn't the right word since it keeps

Re: Assigning keyword/stable bugs to arch teams (WAS: [gentoo-dev] dropping redundant stable keywords)

2014-02-17 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 14:50:41 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 06:58:47PM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 09:41:03 +0100 > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > > El dom, 16-02-2014 a las 00:37 +0100, Jeroen Roovers escribió: > > > [...] > > > > > If we want a separa

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman feature request / profiles.desc profile types

2014-02-17 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:58:39 +0100 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > > Hi all, > > Right now we have arches maintaining a stable keyword and we have > arches that don't do that. > > This makes me think that the classification of profiles as "exp", > "dev", "stable" in profiles.desc does not reall