While I'm adding USE defaults to toolchain.eclass and moving them out of the
profiles, I thought now would be a good time to review a couple default flag
settings.
mudflap:
This is currently enabled by default but I'd like to disable it. It controls
libmudflap and the -fmudflap flag. I think the
On 12 January 2014 08:16, Kent Fredric wrote:
> diff <( grep cpan
> /var/paludis/repositories/perl-git/profiles/thirdpartymirrors ) <( grep
> cpan /usr/portage/profiles/thirdpartymirrors )
>
Oh... also, there's a wide variety of location specific CPAN mirrors
available that are location-speci
On 10 January 2014 17:58, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Just to be clear, what is the exact use case for this? I can't think
> of a really good reason to manipulate mirror lists in subsequent repos.
>
For Perl, in ::gentoo , its considered not too optimal to have backpan
listed as a mirror, and its un
Duncan wrote:
> >> INSTALL_MASK="systemd bash-completion"
> >>
> >> What are your thoughts?
> >
> > It seems like this will generally duplicate all -USE flags.
> >
> > Would it make sense to instead have a single setting which changes the
> > meaning of USE to be that everything not USEd is in
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Ben Kohler wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
>> I would like to make it a directory instead of a single file, and extend
>> the internal syntax.
>>
> I'm not sure I see much real value in allowing individual profiles to
> add/remo
Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 19:11:21
Alan McKinnon napisał(a):
> On 11/01/2014 18:52, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 18:15:09
> > Alan McKinnon napisał(a):
> >
> >> A far better method from a user point of view is to install the linguas
> >> the user explicitly asked for. Your pr
On 11/01/2014 18:52, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 18:15:09
> Alan McKinnon napisał(a):
>
>> A far better method from a user point of view is to install the linguas
>> the user explicitly asked for. Your proposal as worded will be taken at
>> first glance to mean "install all lin
Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 18:15:09
Alan McKinnon napisał(a):
> A far better method from a user point of view is to install the linguas
> the user explicitly asked for. Your proposal as worded will be taken at
> first glance to mean "install all linguas, but not XX" as most users
> won't see the MA
Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 17:21:46
Luis Ressel napisał(a):
> On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:01:34 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > That's a side goal.
> >
> > I was thinking of something like:
> >
> > INSTALL_MASK="linguas -linguas_XX"
> >
> > that would remove all linguas except for language XX.
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 17:01:34 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> That's a side goal.
>
> I was thinking of something like:
>
> INSTALL_MASK="linguas -linguas_XX"
>
> that would remove all linguas except for language XX.
That would be enough for me. A bit of a duplication of information,
but if it e
On 11/01/2014 18:01, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 16:56:37
> Luis Ressel napisał(a):
>
>> I've got an additional proposal: It would be interesting if this
>> feature could also make use of the LINGUAS var for selectively
>> filtering /usr/share/man and and /usr/share/locale, as
Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 16:56:37
Luis Ressel napisał(a):
> I've got an additional proposal: It would be interesting if this
> feature could also make use of the LINGUAS var for selectively
> filtering /usr/share/man and and /usr/share/locale, as most ebuilds
> don't respect this variable nativel
I've got an additional proposal: It would be interesting if this
feature could also make use of the LINGUAS var for selectively
filtering /usr/share/man and and /usr/share/locale, as most ebuilds
don't respect this variable natively.
--
Luis Ressel
GPG fpr: F08D 2AF6 655E 25DE 52BC E53D 08F5 7F
Peter Stuge posted on Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:53:38 +0100 as excerpted:
> Michał Górny wrote:
>> INSTALL_MASK="systemd bash-completion"
>>
>> What are your thoughts?
>
> It seems like this will generally duplicate all -USE flags.
>
> Would it make sense to instead have a single setting which chan
Hi, Igor
LTHR writes:
> Portage QOS
>
> Hi All,
>
> What do you think about implementing this:
>
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=7477494
>
> I've system design in my head and could write it down with the
> implementation details.
> Then may be we could all review it and get to somethi
Michał Górny wrote:
> INSTALL_MASK="systemd bash-completion"
>
> What are your thoughts?
It seems like this will generally duplicate all -USE flags.
Would it make sense to instead have a single setting which changes
the meaning of USE to be that everything not USEd is install-masked?
Rather t
On 2014.01.10 16:48, Igor wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Thank you for all our feedback!
>
[snip]
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor mailto:lanthrus...@gmail.com
>
Igor,
You don't need anyones permission to start an OSS project.
Just do it. If its useful, it will get used.
Her
On 01/11/2014 11:07 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> If we limit it to the virtual, pam and pambase, I'm happy to stick
> maintaining them, the others I don't use, which is why I don't care about
> them as much.
>
> Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
> flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
El sáb, 11-01-2014 a las 11:07 +, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
> If we limit it to the virtual, pam and pambase, I'm happy to stick
> maintaining them, the others I don't use, which is why I don't care
> about them as much.
>
> Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
> flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://b
If we limit it to the virtual, pam and pambase, I'm happy to stick
maintaining them, the others I don't use, which is why I don't care about
them as much.
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
On 11 January 2014 11:01, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El sáb, 11
El sáb, 11-01-2014 a las 10:57 +, Markos Chandras escribió:
> On 01/10/2014 11:14 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > On 10 January 2014 22:20, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >
> >> how would moving it to base-system make any difference ? people doing it
> >> wrong
> >> wouldn't really care which her
On 01/10/2014 11:14 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 10 January 2014 22:20, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>> how would moving it to base-system make any difference ? people doing it
>> wrong
>> wouldn't really care which herd pam itself is owned by.
>>
>
> I'm not saying it makes a difference, sorr
Hello, all.
Some time ago I wrote a small tool called install-mask. As the name
suggests, it was intended to help with manipulating INSTALL_MASK.
I think that its most important feature was ability to use pre-defined
mask lists to easily mask unwanted directories without getting into
the details.
23 matches
Mail list logo
