On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Very limited usefulness, a lot of extra complexity. We'd rather work on
> making eclasses simpler.
Sorry to beat a potentially dead horse, but many days later, I still
can't bring myself to agree with this, at least, not with respect to
src_c
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:48:17 -0500
Emery Hemingway wrote:
> I really like working with Go, and would like to see a means of merging
> Go packages with Portage. In short I am asking if anyone else is
> interested in a Go project.
>
>
> For those who aren't familiar with Go, I will sumarise why P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/30/2013 03:48 PM, Emery Hemingway wrote:
> I really like working with Go, and would like to see a means of merging
> Go packages with Portage. In short I am asking if anyone else is
> interested in a Go project.
>
>
> For those who aren't famil
I really like working with Go, and would like to see a means of merging
Go packages with Portage. In short I am asking if anyone else is
interested in a Go project.
For those who aren't familiar with Go, I will sumarise why Portage and
Go do not play well together.
Go is static linked by default
On 12/29/2013 01:19 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
dev-db/redis
I'll try my best on this one.
sys-cluster/corosync
Obviously I'll keep on working on this one along with the cluster team.
Cheers
Ultrabug
