-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> net-analyzer/sslsniff #zerochaos seems to have this as well, I can
> co-maintain :D
be my guest
- -Zero
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGB
You know there are already projects like cfengine and puppet that seems
to be way ahead.
Also most of the links on the project page are not working anymore.
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 07:25:19 -0700
Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-29 at 17:15 +0400, Sergey Popov wrote:
> > Hello, i just want to
I can help on dev-vcs/git ?
On Oct 31, 2013 8:31 AM, "Robin H. Johnson" wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 06:27:17PM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > dev-libs/libmemcache #ok
> > dev-libs/libmemcached #so
> > dev-vcs/git #I will need help with this 600+ line ebuild...
> On that middle li
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 06:27:17PM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote:
> dev-libs/libmemcache #ok
> dev-libs/libmemcached #so
> dev-vcs/git #I will need help with this 600+ line ebuild...
On that middle list, I suggest adding yourself, not replacing me.
> net-misc/ifenslave#I'll take it
Lon
On 10/30/2013 05:10 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Since it's been nearly a year since I last sent this email (and I got poked
> with a stick about this), it's time for a reminder. I hope that in future, if
> we get a non-maintainer update GLEP [1], this will become unneeded, as it can
On Wednesday 30 of October 2013 22:10:27 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Packages for tree-cleaner consideration:
> dev-vcs/gitosis
> dev-vcs/gitosis-gentoo
Kill them, gitolite is the proper replacement
Theo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi all,
Since it's been nearly a year since I last sent this email (and I got poked
with a stick about this), it's time for a reminder. I hope that in future, if
we get a non-maintainer update GLEP [1], this will become unneeded, as it can
be on api.gentoo.org.
1. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.li
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Vincent-Xavier JUMEL
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm developping and using a sympa ebuild for personnal use on a Gentoo
> box.
>
> In order to work correctly with postfix, sympa needs to have its binary
> /usr/libexec/queue and /usr/libexec/bouncequeue with the SUID
Hi everyone,
I'm developping and using a sympa ebuild for personnal use on a Gentoo
box.
In order to work correctly with postfix, sympa needs to have its binary
/usr/libexec/queue and /usr/libexec/bouncequeue with the SUID bit
activated.
What is, in your opinion, the best way to handle it ?
einf
