Rich Freeman posted on Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:31:12 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:04 PM, P.C.
> wrote:
>>
>> Is that "ebuild decay" intentional? How long I can expect ebuilds to
>> stay useful?
>
> There really are no guarantees for anything not in the current tree. The
> EAPIs/ec
Mike Auty schrieb:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm updating the app-crypt/ophcrack-tables package to include the new
> tables available from their site. These are basically just additional
> data packages that can be useful with the app-crypt/ophcrack package,
> but they're very large. Including all of t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/2013 07:29 PM, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
> Can't the users download and install those tables manually from the
> official ophcrack website/server? If so, maybe adding the instructions
> in the pkg_postinst() phase of app-crypt/ophcrack ebui
On 10/16/2013 07:20 AM, Mike Auty wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm updating the app-crypt/ophcrack-tables package to include the new
> tables available from their site. These are basically just additional
> data packages that can be useful with the app-crypt/ophcrack package,
> but they're very large.
Can't the users download and install those tables manually from the
official ophcrack website/server? If so, maybe adding the instructions
in the pkg_postinst() phase of app-crypt/ophcrack ebuild would be
enough. In that case, it wouldn't make sense having
app-crypt/ophcrack-tables in the portage t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I'm updating the app-crypt/ophcrack-tables package to include the new
tables available from their site. These are basically just additional
data packages that can be useful with the app-crypt/ophcrack package,
but they're very large. Inclu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello
As you have just affirmed the undertaker's lead decision; this mail
now rather serves as questions and argumentation for future reference.
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:16:43 +0200
hasufell wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/2013 11:00 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 09:53 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 10:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/15/20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/15/2013 09:53 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 10:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
> I wonder if unde
El mar, 15-10-2013 a las 22:53 +0200, hasufell escribió:
[...]
> I have read that and that is why I propose that undertakers do also
> check projects for their internal activity patterns.
>
> I don't really think that is a job for the council.
I think it's a job for the other project members, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/15/2013 10:46 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive
proj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/15/2013 09:40 PM, hasufell wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
>>> I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive project
>>> leaders/members and remove them from the proje
On 10/15/2013 10:28 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
>> I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive project
>> leaders/members and remove them from the projects in case there
>> has not been any activity for a while, regardless of the internal
>> proj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/15/2013 09:16 PM, hasufell wrote:
> I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive project
> leaders/members and remove them from the projects in case there
> has not been any activity for a while, regardless of the internal
> project
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I wonder if undertakers should also check for inactive project
leaders/members and remove them from the projects in case there has
not been any activity for a while, regardless of the internal project
structure.
Authority does not only come with knowl
Michał Górny wrote:
> My laptop is broken and I no longer have any hardware that would use
> this. It fails to compile with the current kernel [1] and upstream is
> not really active.
I forward-ported the driver in 2011 but probably that's obsolete too.
http://git.stuge.se/stk11-driver.git
//Pe
Hello P.C.
The distfiles mirroring system keeps distfiles around for as long as
the ebuilds are in the Portage tree that refer to them; once all
ebuilds referring to a distfile are removed, the distfile will be
removed from the mirroring system in half a week or so. *
Long story short, if you wan
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:04 PM, P.C.
wrote:
>
> Is that "ebuild decay" intentional? How long I can expect ebuilds to
> stay useful?
There really are no guarantees for anything not in the current tree.
The EAPIs/eclasses themselves are pretty well-designed and while
breakage over a period of year
Hi,
I've been trying to set up a Gentoo system using an older version of
the portage tree [1]. Most of it goes well, but some ebuilds stopped
merging correctly. Namely, it's Python 2.7. While merging, it
requests the following file:
http://gentoo.ussg.indiana.edu/distfiles/python-gentoo-patches-2.
media-video/stk11xx is looking for a new maintainer.
My laptop is broken and I no longer have any hardware that would use
this. It fails to compile with the current kernel [1] and upstream is
not really active.
I have reassigned the package to maintainer-needed. Feel free to take
it anytime you w
Quoting Sergey Popov (2013-10-15 13:32:36)
> 15.10.2013 02:38, Stanislav Ochotnicky пишет:
> > Any takers? Feel free to add yourself to the top of metadata.xml and ping
> > me on
> > IRC. Unless I'll find some other primary maintainer I'll move to package to
> > maintainer-wanted so that bugs don'
15.10.2013 02:38, Stanislav Ochotnicky пишет:
> Any takers? Feel free to add yourself to the top of metadata.xml and ping me
> on
> IRC. Unless I'll find some other primary maintainer I'll move to package to
> maintainer-wanted so that bugs don't accidentally end up in black hole.
Little clarific
13.10.2013 11:46, Sven Eden пишет:
> Am Samstag, 12. Oktober 2013, 08:45:15 schrieb Pacho Ramos:
>> Due pebenito retirement:
>> dev-libs/ustr
>
> I've never heard of that package before, but the description sounded
> interesting. So I went to their site and read what it is about, and it looks
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
