On 4 October 2013 17:03, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> but even what you're describing
> above won't cover _everything_, and this is mostly what I'm saying.
>
Yeh, its a given that it won't cover /all/ scenarios. Its obviously not
intended to /replace/ arch testers, just supplementary context.
I just removed myself from this herd (not enough time and I have not
used Afterstep for a long long time), feel free to join if you are an
Afterstep user!
Open bugs currently include fixing some ignored LDFLAGS, a compilation
failure in libafterimage, and a version bump for afterstep itself
