Re: [gentoo-dev] git-r3: initial draft for review

2013-08-30 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/30/2013 07:37 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, all. > > After a few days of thinking, discovering and working, here it is. > The first working draft of new git eclass codenamed 'git-r3'. > > First of all, the name is not final. I'm open to idea

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] git.eclass, git-2.eclass... git-r1.eclass?

2013-08-30 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > The new eclass is supposedly used by 732 in-tree packages [1], > and possibly a few dozens out-of-the-tree. Some parts of the eclass API > are barely used. I would really prefer to avoid yet another eclass > migration. that's a shame, I don't think

Re: [gentoo-dev] git-r3: initial draft for review

2013-08-30 Thread Markos Chandras
On 31 August 2013 00:37, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, all. > > After a few days of thinking, discovering and working, here it is. > The first working draft of new git eclass codenamed 'git-r3'. > > First of all, the name is not final. I'm open to ideas. I'm open to > naming it 'git-r1' to put it i

Re: [gentoo-dev] git-r3: initial draft for review

2013-08-30 Thread C. Bergström
Do you have any plans to add support for sparse checkout? Something like this |cd git clone -n cd git remote add –f git config core.sparsecheckout true echo // >> .git/info/sparse-checkout git checkout (Credit goes to : http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15827117/git-sparse-checkout-for-

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] git.eclass, git-2.eclass... git-r1.eclass?

2013-08-30 Thread hasufell
On 08/28/2013 10:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > What are your thoughts? > Not interested in any of those suggestions. git-2.eclass works fine for me and I will keep using it.

[gentoo-dev] git-r3: initial draft for review

2013-08-30 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, all. After a few days of thinking, discovering and working, here it is. The first working draft of new git eclass codenamed 'git-r3'. First of all, the name is not final. I'm open to ideas. I'm open to naming it 'git-r1' to put it in line with my other -r1 eclasses :). I'd definitely like

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies

2013-08-30 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 16:12 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > # Redmine > > =dev-ruby/builder-3.1.4 ~amd64 > > =dev-ruby/rails-3.2.13 ~amd64 > Ok, this one is ridiculous. The stable version of Rails is 2.3.18, and > 3.0 was released almost exactly three years ago. Every time rails-3.x > gets bum