On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:28:24 +0100
Markos Chandras wrote:
> Wow! That is something we actively encourage people to avoid. Mixed
> systems are totally
> unsupported and I am sure quite a few bugs are closed as invalid when
> a mixed system is detected.
>
> It may work on regular basis but encoura
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:27:02 +0100
"Steven J. Long" wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013:
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > "Steven J. Long" wrote:
> >
> > > The core system has to be a usable basis to build "everything"
> > > from.
> >
> > I do agree with this except for "shaky"; it is a nice goal to
> > purs
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013:
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> "Steven J. Long" wrote:
>
> > The core system has to be a usable basis to build "everything" from.
>
> I do agree with this except for "shaky"; it is a nice goal to pursue...
>
> That still does not make us able to do it or make it a realistic goal.
Bu
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Yes, it will be an array. But I guess we will support a space
>> separated list in addition, for consistency with DOCS.
> This would be very bad since most patches use ${FILESDIR}.
> Putting that in a plain string sounds like final bullet in
> whi
Dnia 2013-08-23, o godz. 13:35:11
Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
> > I take it PATCHES variable will be a bash array, or space separated
> > list?
>
> Yes, it will be an array. But I guess we will support a space
> separated list in addition, for consistency with DOCS.
This would be very bad since
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Brian Dolbec wrote:
>> Only suggestion so far is "dopatch". I don't really like it because
>> other do* functions are called from src_install. But if nobody
>> comes up with a better name, then it will be dopatch.
> What about:
> srcpatch()
Hm, that looks like a phase
On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 11:45 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> For EAPI 6, introduction of a patch applying function to the package
> manager itself is being discussed. This would serve two purposes:
> - support for PATCHES variable in a default src
Dnia 2013-08-23, o godz. 11:45:57
Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
> > 2. Should the function do automatic -p* detection, or should it
> >default to -p1? Both would be overridable by an explicit -p*
> >option. There are good arguments for either variant
> >(see the above-mentioned bug).
>
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> For EAPI 6, introduction of a patch applying function to the package
> manager itself is being discussed. This would serve two purposes:
> - support for PATCHES variable in a default src_install phase
> - a function to apply user patches
> In bug
