El mié, 31-07-2013 a las 22:32 -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev escribió:
> On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 22:12 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Honestly, I don't think maintainers should be asked to justify
> > features unless they're actually causing some kind of conflict.
> >
> > If Robin wants to support USE
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:32:56PM -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 22:12 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Honestly, I don't think maintainers should be asked to justify
> > features unless they're actually causing some kind of conflict.
> >
> > If Robin wants to support US
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 04:22:29AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> On 01/08/13 04:03, William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:42:26PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >> As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to
> >> go and look at fixing them, because I'd pref
On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 22:12 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Honestly, I don't think maintainers should be asked to justify
> features unless they're actually causing some kind of conflict.
>
> If Robin wants to support USE=static for lvm2, he can do so. If it
> somehow caused problems with other pac
On 01/08/13 04:03, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:42:26PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to
>> go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as
>> static builds.
>
> Robin,
>
> I'm cu
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:03 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:42:26PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to
>> go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as
>> static builds.
>
> I'm
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 07:42:26PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to
> go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as
> static builds.
Robin,
I'm curious what the use case for keeping them as static bu
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:58:37PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote
> On 07/31/2013 11:53 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > Hold on a minute. There is a *MAJOR* difference between "gpm" the USE
> > flag, and sys-libs/gpm the mouse server.
> [...]
> > If there was a move afoot to remove sys-libs/gpm from th
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:58:37PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote
> On 07/31/2013 11:53 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > Hold on a minute. There is a *MAJOR* difference between "gpm" the USE
> > flag, and sys-libs/gpm the mouse server.
> [...]
> > If there was a move afoot to remove sys-libs/gpm from th
El mié, 31-07-2013 a las 19:42 +, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
> As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to
> go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as
> static builds.
>
But, what is requiring it?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?i
As both a member of base-system, and the lvm2 maintainer, I'm going to
go and look at fixing them, because I'd prefer to keep them available as
static builds.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:07:39PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mar, 30-07-2013 a las 11:42 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
> > On 29/07
El mié, 31-07-2013 a las 15:19 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribió:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El mié, 31-07-2013 a las 12:11 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> >> On 07/31/2013 12:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >> > I would like to know if there is any kind of DB to check for pack
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mié, 31-07-2013 a las 12:11 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
>> On 07/31/2013 12:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> > I would like to know if there is any kind of DB to check for packages
>> > providing files under a directory. Does any exist?
>>
>> po
El mié, 31-07-2013 a las 12:11 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
> On 07/31/2013 12:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > I would like to know if there is any kind of DB to check for packages
> > providing files under a directory. Does any exist?
>
> portageq owners / /path/to/directory
But, doesn't it force m
On 07/31/2013 12:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> I would like to know if there is any kind of DB to check for packages
> providing files under a directory. Does any exist?
portageq owners / /path/to/directory
--
Thanks,
Zac
El mar, 30-07-2013 a las 11:42 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
> On 29/07/13 23:57, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > As discussed at:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478476
> >
> > Upstream is dropping static libs from udev and, then, sys-apps/udev is
> > currently reverting that c
I would like to know if there is any kind of DB to check for packages
providing files under a directory. Does any exist?
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:04:56 -0700
> Matt Turner wrote:
>
>> I committed it last night before your email.
>
> # Keep it sorted. Please do not add anything without prior
> discussion # on
> gentoo-dev.
> n32
> n64
> o32
>
> This is not a val
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/07/13 10:53 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:40 AM, viv...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>> does "storage space" make everyone happy?
>>
>
> rich0 is confused and looks over at the "storage space" he keeps
> his bicycles in...
>
'
Jeroen Roovers writes:
> Also, "drive space" would be dead wrong. A drive[1] is a device which
> holds a storage medium (often a disk, as in, you know, a "disk drive").
> "Solid-state drive" is even more confusing than "solid-state disk" (and
> both are common parlance).
In the interest of lingu
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Ole Markus With
wrote:
> I don't really care what the separator is. The reason I chose dash for
> separation major/minor version was simply to distinguish between the
> value and variable part of USE_EXPAND. Just seemed natural at the time.
>
I think a hyphen/dash
Walter Dnes posted on Wed, 31 Jul 2013 05:53:50 -0400 as excerpted:
> Hold on a minute. There is a *MAJOR* difference between "gpm" the USE
> flag, and sys-libs/gpm the mouse server. I'm one of those weird guys
> who starts USE with "-*".
Me too.
> And I do not have "gpm" the USE flag enabled.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:21:20AM +0200, Michael Weber wrote
>> Mostly everything is configurable, and revertable as user - granted.
>>
>> I'd like to see a announcement and an optional discussion on this list
>> if base profile gets changed [
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:04:56 -0700
Matt Turner wrote:
> I committed it last night before your email.
# Keep it sorted. Please do not add anything without prior
discussion # on
gentoo-dev.
n32
n64
o32
This is not a valid format for a .desc file. You should use:
-
jer
On 07/31/2013 11:53 AM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> Hold on a minute. There is a *MAJOR* difference between "gpm" the USE
> flag, and sys-libs/gpm the mouse server.
[...]
> If there was a move afoot to remove sys-libs/gpm from the install ISO,
> I would be part of the crowd up in arms about this.
It
Hi list,
I'd like to propose a new eclass "db-use-r1" [1].
While working on the dev-libs/Ice package I found it to fail with sys-
libs/db:6.0 (see [2]) and I have found no way to use current db-use.eclass to
make Ice compile against an older sys-libs/db slot if db:6.0 is installed.
So I'd like
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 08:21:20AM +0200, Michael Weber wrote
> Mostly everything is configurable, and revertable as user - granted.
>
> I'd like to see a announcement and an optional discussion on this list
> if base profile gets changed [0] - current case bug 449364 [1].
>
> I'm not opposed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dnia 2013-07-31, o godz. 09:38:20
Ole Markus With napisał(a):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/28/2013 06:54 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > Because it would require us to change a whole load more than just
> > the tar
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
> I'd like to see a announcement and an optional discussion on this list
> if base profile gets changed [0] - current case bug 449364 [1].
I think that makes a lot of sense as a guideline. To me, it's a bit
weird to change a USE flag default f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2013 06:54 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Because it would require us to change a whole load more than just
> the targets variable.
>
This is sort of the same for PHP. We need to know the major and minor
version based on the flag value. We
30 matches
Mail list logo
