On 09/07/13 08:29 PM, Alex Legler wrote:
> On 10.07.2013 01:53, Alex Xu wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't really like the default MW table style here; it doesn't really
>>> look... Gentoo, if you will. I hacked around the CSS a bit and I'd say
>>> the new look works better. http://i.imgur.com/5eD7FGy.png
>>>
On 10.07.2013 01:53, Alex Xu wrote:
> (Delayed due to list servers being down)
> On 08/07/13 06:48 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
>> On 08/07/13 04:02 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:54:47PM +0200, Alex Legler wrote:
>>> I keep track of the stuff at [1], an example output can already b
(Delayed due to list servers being down)
On 08/07/13 06:48 PM, Alex Xu wrote:
> On 08/07/13 04:02 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:54:47PM +0200, Alex Legler wrote:
>> I keep track of the stuff at [1], an example output can already be found at
>> [2].
>>
>> [1] https://wiki.
Tom Wijsman wrote:
> "Steven J. Long" wrote:
> > The bit about the user explicitly opting-in to 'fragile' patches still
> > is of concern, however.
>
> Why is this still of concern?
..
> My original post mentions "3) The patch should not affect the build by
> default.", which I later clarified wit
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> I did some additional work on the style (as well as making a small wrapper
> script to simplify handling it). There are still some issues that I need to
> sort out, but I hope I can do that the coming days.
>
> I keep track of the stuff at [1], an example output can already
