[gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014

2013-07-05 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 21:27:46 -0700 Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 22:18 -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > > On 07/05/2013 09:41 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > > On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:47:08 -0400 > > > "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" wrote: > > > > > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

[gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014

2013-07-05 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 22:18 -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > On 07/05/2013 09:41 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:47:08 -0400 > > "Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" wrote: > > > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >>> Paweł was nice enough to write a patc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Hangouts

2013-07-05 Thread Raymond Jennings
Not to mention how do you actually log a hangout for the record instead of already having logs from an irc session or mailing list. On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > > just opening a webcam and talking is just going to give an amateurish > feeling

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-05 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 09:38:10 +0100 "Steven J. Long" wrote: > Tom Wijsman wrote: > > > > Yes, we currently have "base" and "extras" tarballs for genpatches; > > it is trivial to add a "experimental" tarball to this set, all the > > optional experimental patches will be in that tarball. This is als

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-kernel] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-05 Thread Steven J. Long
Tom Wijsman wrote: > Steven J. Long wrote: > > Tom Wijsman wrote: > > > "Steven J. Long" wrote: > > > > If it does [affect the build by default] then it should never be > > > > applied, unless the user specifically asks for it, imo, and the > > > > resultant kernel is labelled -exp as you suggest.

Re: [gentoo-dev] font.eclass add Xorg FontPath elements for non-standard paths

2013-07-05 Thread Michael Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 07/05/2013 08:37 AM, James Cloos wrote: > While making it easier for those who want all of their fonts > included in the x11 server-side font list is not an unreasonable > goal, forcing them to be is unreasonable. > > As someone who has run X11 r