Rich Freeman wrote:
> I think it really needs to be accommodated in the same way as openrc
> init.d scripts. I'm not saying that maintainers should be required to
> create them if they're missing (they don't even have to do that for
> openrc init.d scripts). However, if users or other devs contri
Ambroz Bizjak wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
> > Init.d scripts are programs - they could probably do just about anything.
>
> They couldn't monitor a process and restart it when it crashes, as
> specified by the restart options in the unit file. That is, without
> significant modifications in the w
+# Johannes Huber (09 May 2013)
+# Masked for removal in 30 days. Package is obsolete.
+# Upstream replaced it with net-libs/libkgapi.
+kde-misc/akonadi-google
--
Johannes Huber (johu)
Gentoo Linux Developer / KDE Team
GPG Key ID F3CFD2BD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
El jue, 09-05-2013 a las 18:44 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
[...]
> A similar variant is implemented in app-portage/install-mask which maps
> names obtained from ${FILESDIR} to paths.
>
Didn't know that utility :O, thanks! (maybe, at least, a blog entry
could have been added when you did this to
El mié, 08-05-2013 a las 20:59 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> On Wednesday 05 December 2012 18:02:51 Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > - if grep -q "disable-scrollkeeper" configure; then
> > + if grep -q "disable-scrollkeeper" ${ECONF_SOURCE:-.}/configure; then
>
> ECONF_SOURCE should be quoted
> -
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> We should probably consider extending the INSTALL_MASK a bit. A good
> idea would be to allow repositories to pre-define names
> for INSTALL_MASK (alike USE flags) and allow portage to control them
> over those names.
We'd need a correspondin
On Thu, 09 May 2013 05:56:42 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" wrote:
> On 05/08/2013 10:01 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 May 2013 21:48:36 -0400
> > "Walter Dnes" wrote:
> >
> >>Wouldn't the "systemd" USE flag be the appropriate one to key on?
> >> The description in /usr/portage/profiles
В письме от 29 апреля 2013 15:43:03 пользователь Jeroen Roovers написал:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:14:51 +0900
>
> heroxbd wrote:
> > KEYWORDS="~hppa-hpux ~m68k-mint ~ppc-aix ~x64-solaris ~x86-interix["]
> >
> > KEYWORDS_ARCH="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~m68k ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64
> > ~s390 ~sh ~
Michael Mol wrote:
> obviously you have an interesting position as a dev in a distribution,
> and you might make your change there, but that certainly shouldn't be
> your default course of action.
+1 and not just for unit files.
//Peter
pgpQGx9XaD1PC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:18 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 10:31:21PM +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote
>
>> The overhead of the files' presence is trivial, and most users won't
>> care. Those who do care have a trivial line to add in make.conf, and
>> that is for the small number of p
On 05/08/2013 10:01 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Wed, 8 May 2013 21:48:36 -0400
"Walter Dnes" wrote:
Wouldn't the "systemd" USE flag be the appropriate one to key on?
The description in /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc says...
systemd - Enable use of systemd-specific libraries and features l
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:06:00PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 May 2013 21:01:19 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 07 May 2013 23:59:18 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > we've already got a database for maintaining this sort of thing on a per-
> > > package basis: metadata.xml. so
12 matches
Mail list logo
